Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

San Diego's Section 8 drug and crime wave

$3 million in fraudulent overpayments amid lax reporting and enforcement

Is Casa Mira View too large to be monitored by the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program?
Is Casa Mira View too large to be monitored by the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program?

Fraud, drug use, and other criminal activity has been going unpunished in the county's so-called Section 8 subsidized housing program, with lax enforcement by officials causing multimillion-dollar havoc.

So says an August 3 report by San Diego County’s chief of audits, Juan Perez, following a lengthy investigation of the long-troubled subsidy program.

"The Section 8 Rental Assistance Program is a federally funded program that provides monthly rental assistance through the Housing Choice Voucher Program," notes the report.

"It is locally administered by the Housing Authority of the County of San Diego."

Zygmunt Wilf

As reported here last month by Moss Gropen, the subsidy program is controversial in some parts, the most recent case being that of Casa Mira View, a vast apartment complex visible from I-15 in Mira Mesa that was built by Garden Communities, controlled by Minnesota Vikings owner Zygmunt Wilf.

Sponsored
Sponsored

Only two people to investigate criminal activity countywide

To keep track of criminal activity involving Section 8, two employees of the county housing authority's review and integrity unit are assigned full time to "investigate allegations of program abuse and potential fraud," the audit says.

Based on the document's conclusions, it's a lot to handle.

Auditors "identified over $3M of outstanding receivables that resulted from fraudulent overpayments” and "noted that only one case with a fraudulent overpayment of $25,120 was referred to the District Attorney for prosecution since July 2012 to date."

From July 1, 2013, through September 30, 2013, according to the document, the integrity unit "received 236 allegations of fraud and abuse. This equates to an average of 78 allegations per month or 936 allegations per year."

During the period of the audit, from fiscal year 2013 through the present, auditors sought to determine "whether the Program Review and Integrity Unit’s procedures are adequate to allow for thorough investigations of fraud, claims and complaints received."

According to the report, a "judgmental sample of 30 complaints of suspected program fraud and abuse was selected for detailed testing," of which 12 had issues regarding the "timeliness and adequacy of procedures followed."

Four complaints from 2013, involving an assortment of violence, criminal activity, income, and drugs, have yet to be dealt with, the audit found.

Though the county's housing agency "initiated the investigation soon after the complaints were received, there was no evidence of closure and resolution documented within the case files."

The auditors were told that the agency has "limited resources assigned to the unit which prevents them from addressing complaints received in a timely manner."

Making matters worse, auditors "found that investigation activities conducted for two complaints received in 2013 with allegations of criminal activity and drugs were not sufficient."

In one example uncovered by the review, an August 7, 2013, complaint "was referred by the Sheriff’s Department documenting that the people living in the unit had engaged in criminal activity (burglary)," but no follow-up investigation was conducted.

"Burglary is not an actionable offense"

By way of explanation, the agency staff told auditors "burglary is not an actionable offense per HUD regulations, as it does not affect the housing unit or individuals living in the unit. Therefore, further examination of the complaint was not deemed necessary."

The tenant "was eventually removed from the Section 8 Program in December 2014 as a result of an arrest due to the possession of illegal drugs in the unit," according to the document.

One meeting and drug allegations laid to rest

In another case, a September 2013 complaint alleged a participant in the subsidized program had committed "violations to the program including the use of drugs."

The document continues, "In addition, there were several complaints from the property management claiming the tenant was in violation of the terms of the lease by engaging in the use of drugs and disruptive behavior."

Says the audit, "staff held a conference with the participant and based solely on that conference cleared them of the allegations. There was no evidence within the case file that a follow up was scheduled."

In addition, six of the complaints reviewed — five of which were said to have involved criminal activity, three of them violent — were missing from their investigative files. As a result, says the audit, the housing agency "was unable to confirm if an investigation into the complaint was conducted."

In a July 28 response to the audit, Housing and Community Development department director Todd Henderson generally agreed with the report's findings and recommendations to set performance goals for “the timeframe in which claims should be investigated and resolved,” saying an update would be done by August 31.

"However, it is important to note that investigations can take anywhere from a few hours to several months or longer to conclude, depending on the complexity of the allegations and the information provided."

The letter adds that "a process for Quality Control review of the allegation log, files created, and files selected for investigation was implemented, effective July 1, 2015.

Regarding the making of criminal referrals, he wrote, "It is important to note that not all criminal activity is against program rules," but added, "effective immediately, case notes will be documented to reflect the status of the investigation."

In answer to the audit's finding of fraudulent overpayments, Henderson's letter adds that his department would revise its procedures "to include [district attorney] contact information, forms, and timeframes. It is important to note that [the housing department] has no discretion over which cases are accepted for prosecution by the District Attorney."

Adds the letter, "The process for engaging the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General will be similarly documented and included in the desk manual."

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Celebrate Holi, Borrego Springs Music Festival

Events March 23-March 27, 2024
Next Article

A poem for March by Joseph O’Brien

“March’s Lovely Asymptotes”
Is Casa Mira View too large to be monitored by the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program?
Is Casa Mira View too large to be monitored by the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program?

Fraud, drug use, and other criminal activity has been going unpunished in the county's so-called Section 8 subsidized housing program, with lax enforcement by officials causing multimillion-dollar havoc.

So says an August 3 report by San Diego County’s chief of audits, Juan Perez, following a lengthy investigation of the long-troubled subsidy program.

"The Section 8 Rental Assistance Program is a federally funded program that provides monthly rental assistance through the Housing Choice Voucher Program," notes the report.

"It is locally administered by the Housing Authority of the County of San Diego."

Zygmunt Wilf

As reported here last month by Moss Gropen, the subsidy program is controversial in some parts, the most recent case being that of Casa Mira View, a vast apartment complex visible from I-15 in Mira Mesa that was built by Garden Communities, controlled by Minnesota Vikings owner Zygmunt Wilf.

Sponsored
Sponsored

Only two people to investigate criminal activity countywide

To keep track of criminal activity involving Section 8, two employees of the county housing authority's review and integrity unit are assigned full time to "investigate allegations of program abuse and potential fraud," the audit says.

Based on the document's conclusions, it's a lot to handle.

Auditors "identified over $3M of outstanding receivables that resulted from fraudulent overpayments” and "noted that only one case with a fraudulent overpayment of $25,120 was referred to the District Attorney for prosecution since July 2012 to date."

From July 1, 2013, through September 30, 2013, according to the document, the integrity unit "received 236 allegations of fraud and abuse. This equates to an average of 78 allegations per month or 936 allegations per year."

During the period of the audit, from fiscal year 2013 through the present, auditors sought to determine "whether the Program Review and Integrity Unit’s procedures are adequate to allow for thorough investigations of fraud, claims and complaints received."

According to the report, a "judgmental sample of 30 complaints of suspected program fraud and abuse was selected for detailed testing," of which 12 had issues regarding the "timeliness and adequacy of procedures followed."

Four complaints from 2013, involving an assortment of violence, criminal activity, income, and drugs, have yet to be dealt with, the audit found.

Though the county's housing agency "initiated the investigation soon after the complaints were received, there was no evidence of closure and resolution documented within the case files."

The auditors were told that the agency has "limited resources assigned to the unit which prevents them from addressing complaints received in a timely manner."

Making matters worse, auditors "found that investigation activities conducted for two complaints received in 2013 with allegations of criminal activity and drugs were not sufficient."

In one example uncovered by the review, an August 7, 2013, complaint "was referred by the Sheriff’s Department documenting that the people living in the unit had engaged in criminal activity (burglary)," but no follow-up investigation was conducted.

"Burglary is not an actionable offense"

By way of explanation, the agency staff told auditors "burglary is not an actionable offense per HUD regulations, as it does not affect the housing unit or individuals living in the unit. Therefore, further examination of the complaint was not deemed necessary."

The tenant "was eventually removed from the Section 8 Program in December 2014 as a result of an arrest due to the possession of illegal drugs in the unit," according to the document.

One meeting and drug allegations laid to rest

In another case, a September 2013 complaint alleged a participant in the subsidized program had committed "violations to the program including the use of drugs."

The document continues, "In addition, there were several complaints from the property management claiming the tenant was in violation of the terms of the lease by engaging in the use of drugs and disruptive behavior."

Says the audit, "staff held a conference with the participant and based solely on that conference cleared them of the allegations. There was no evidence within the case file that a follow up was scheduled."

In addition, six of the complaints reviewed — five of which were said to have involved criminal activity, three of them violent — were missing from their investigative files. As a result, says the audit, the housing agency "was unable to confirm if an investigation into the complaint was conducted."

In a July 28 response to the audit, Housing and Community Development department director Todd Henderson generally agreed with the report's findings and recommendations to set performance goals for “the timeframe in which claims should be investigated and resolved,” saying an update would be done by August 31.

"However, it is important to note that investigations can take anywhere from a few hours to several months or longer to conclude, depending on the complexity of the allegations and the information provided."

The letter adds that "a process for Quality Control review of the allegation log, files created, and files selected for investigation was implemented, effective July 1, 2015.

Regarding the making of criminal referrals, he wrote, "It is important to note that not all criminal activity is against program rules," but added, "effective immediately, case notes will be documented to reflect the status of the investigation."

In answer to the audit's finding of fraudulent overpayments, Henderson's letter adds that his department would revise its procedures "to include [district attorney] contact information, forms, and timeframes. It is important to note that [the housing department] has no discretion over which cases are accepted for prosecution by the District Attorney."

Adds the letter, "The process for engaging the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General will be similarly documented and included in the desk manual."

Comments
Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Tyler Farr, Blue Water Film Festival, Mustache Bash

Events March 21-March 23, 2024
Next Article

Taco Taco Poway still has 99-cent fish tacos

Tacotopia prizewinner is well known among Powegians
Comments
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.