Proposition C promised an independent city auditor. It delivered an “independent” auditor.
  • Proposition C promised an independent city auditor. It delivered an “independent” auditor.
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Eduardo Luna

Mike Aguirre

Jerry Sanders

Steve Erie

A city can have an independent auditor or it can have an “independent” auditor. To no one’s surprise, San Diego has the latter.

City auditor Eduardo Luna, who was told he would be independent, has battled city leadership over numerous snubs and insults: in May, he asked for $60,580 in legal-defense fees he incurred after former mayor Jerry Sanders spent almost $123,000 of city money to investigate him. Luna was essentially exonerated, but he can’t get his money and is now being told he shouldn’t have hired a lawyer to defend himself. He is being required to sign a statement saying that the city’s audit committee reprimanded him. But his lawyer, Mike Aguirre, says he should not sign it because it is not true.

In his claim seeking the payment, Luna puts blame on the city attorney’s office for holding up his reimbursement. During the investigation, that office provided advice to the audit committee at the same time it claimed to be representing Luna. “That’s a blatant conflict of interest,” says Steve Erie, professor of political science at the University of California San Diego and an expert in local governments. City attorney Jan Goldsmith “is a partisan politician first and a lousy lawyer second.”

Erie coauthored Paradise Plundered: Fiscal Crisis and Governance Failures in San Diego, an award-winning book that shows how San Diego leadership has let the infrastructure and neighborhoods rot to steer money into corporate-welfare projects downtown. Erie is now working on another book to be named Coup D’état San Diego Style: Sex Scandal and the Politically Orchestrated Removal of Mayor Bob Filner.

The investigation and city’s refusal to reimburse his legal fees is not the first insult Luna has had to tackle. When former police chief Bill Lansdowne got into trouble for officer misbehavior, Luna’s office was not invited to investigate. When city employees were suspected of gasoline theft, the police department was given the investigative job — not the auditor. When drug-seizure money was not accounted for, the city initially gave the sleuthing job to the comptroller, although the auditor’s office later checked the findings.

Why has Luna been treated this way? He incurred Sanders’s wrath by investigating the Development Services Department and finding, among many things, that its computer system was a mess and that people were being overcharged and undercharged. Development Services is “the honeypot for the real estate development industry,” says Erie.

Historically in San Diego, real estate developers — a major source of politicians’ lucre — are considered sacred. Cross them at your own risk.

Luna also ruffled the leadership’s feathers by agreeing with the growing chorus of voices saying that the convention center was cooking the books by overstating hotel-tax receipts, attendee spending, and the center’s economic impact. Luna was stepping on more sacred toes.

Luna “looked so mild when he came in,” says Norma Damashek, a political commentator. “He looked like he was going to be a quiet pushover, and he turned out to be a tough guy in the best sense of the word. So, now [San Diego’s leadership] is trying to humiliate him or make his life so hard that he will resign before his time is up.”

The clandestine attempt to frighten Luna was entirely predictable from the outset. In mid-2006, the city, deep in a fiscal hole, was found to have issued false information when it sold municipal bonds. The auditor at the time had ignored the falsehoods. “No office…failed the City and its investors more than the Office of the City Auditor and Comptroller,” said a report by Kroll, Inc., which investigated the scandal.

The federal Securities and Exchange Commission demanded that the city have an independent auditor. The city attorney at the time was Mike Aguirre. “I sat in a meeting with the [Securities and Exchange Commission]. Sanders promised San Diego would have an independent auditor who can be a watchdog — no more politics,” recalls Aguirre. “Sanders is a liar.”

Sanders had earlier appointed a so-called charter-review committee — made up primarily of developer lobbyists and downtown boosters — which recommended that the mayor appoint the auditor. “It was a stacked-deck sham committee,” says Erie.

Donna Frye

Carl DeMaio

Tom Herbrank

Kevin Faulconer

After some discussion, it was decided that the mayor would appoint an auditor who would report to an audit committee, not the mayor, and hold the job ten years. Supposedly, then, the auditor would be independent. This idea was to go before the voters in 2008 as Prop. C.

Donna Frye, Aguirre, and John Torell, a former auditor who departed blasting the administration for dishonesty, realized this was a case of the fox guarding the henhouse. They opposed it strenuously. But favoring the proposition was the well-financed corporate-welfare crowd: Mayor Sanders, Sempra Energy, the Building Industry Association, the Union-Tribune, the San Diego County Taxpayers Association, and the San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council.

Prop. C won. The citizenry was promised an independent auditor, but the language of Prop. C assured that the auditor would be “independent.” Luna, who had been hired in 2007, was given a ten-year term in spring of 2009. He would report to the five-member audit committee, which, predictably, had a three-person Republican majority: councilman (now mayor) Kevin Faulconer, Carl DeMaio, and Tom Hebrank, a Log Cabin Republican.

“It was a stacked-deck audit committee, too,” says Erie.

Because Aguirre is even more unpopular than Luna with the downtown clique, the refusal to pay the legal bill “is a double wipeout,” says Damashek. “Luna is being punished for being honest. This is a real test of the balance of power in our city.” Local politicians are “too timid — won’t stand up for the public interest when it comes to clean government, open government, and investigating the wrongdoing.”

“The city is slipping back into the practices” that caused the securities agency to demand an independent auditor, says Aguirre, “but the idea of an independent auditor is a sham.” Instead of facing the pension-caused deficit, the city continued to cook the books by “defunding city services, roads, sidewalks, rec centers, libraries, the police department.”

Faulconer did not respond to questions, but a spokesman for Goldsmith claims the city attorney wants an independent auditor.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

MURPHYJUNK July 30, 2014 @ 8:49 a.m.

too bad the good o'l boys don't turn on each other, and be too busy squabbling to screw over the tax payers ( for a while)

1

Don Bauder July 30, 2014 @ 9:08 a.m.

Murphyjunk: The downtown corporate welfare crowd has two core beliefs: 1. Government is bad; 2. We shall use government money to finance the projects that should be financed with private capital. Best, Don Bauder

1

Anon92107 July 30, 2014 @ 12:37 p.m.

Don, I am now beginning to wonder when the City Hall puppets are going to change the name of San Diego to Manchestertown to confirm what we all know now.

Can't wait for Steve's next volume, but the speed of corruption is so fast here that The Reader will have to assign him a daily update column, but then you already do that.

However, since "Corruption R Us" is now the motto of American politics in San Diego, Sacramento and WashDC, we need more professors to join with Steve to try to keep ahead of the sewer tidal waves of destruction our politicians are creating, at least until they change the name of American Democracy to American Oligarchy to confirm what we also know already.

2

Don Bauder July 30, 2014 @ 12:51 p.m.

Anon92107: I don't like "Manchestertown," although it is certainly apt, but it is better than "Papadougsville." Realistically, it should be "Mayberry." Best, Don Bauder

1

Anon92107 July 30, 2014 @ 2:15 p.m.

OK Don, I'll yield to your expertise and vote for your recommendation.

However, America has a most desperate need for an army of intellectuals to inform and motivate Americans to fight for our democracy before we lose it completely.

History proves this imperative over and over again, our two party system is a total failure at protecting our democracy today.

The legacy our generation is passing on today sucks, we thrived on the sacrifices of the Greatest Generation, and then we betrayed our newest generations by destroying human rights and the environment.

0

Don Bauder July 30, 2014 @ 2:42 p.m.

Anon92107: It looked that way at the time of the Robber Barons, too. Legislators and judges at all levels -- local, state, national -- were bought and paid for with money. But we escaped it, at least for several decades. However, there was a lot of ugly history (two world wars, world depression, revolutions) in between. Best, Don Bauder

1

Anon92107 July 31, 2014 @ 2:36 p.m.

Don, do you know of any new escape route we haven't considered this time?

0

Don Bauder July 31, 2014 @ 3:38 p.m.

Anon92107: More than a hundred years ago, at the time of the Progressives and Populists, the oppressed were powerful enough to get a Republican with close financial ties to Wall Street, Teddy Roosevelt, to bust the trusts.

Wealth and income inequality is just as bad today, but the poor and middle class is just comfortable enough not to rebel. Best, Don Bauder

0

HonestGovernment July 30, 2014 @ 6:35 p.m.

It makes me angry that what you report here is just taken for granted, as the way it works in San Diego. But thanks for putting this article together, Don. We have to keep recording the facts of the greedy, power-hungry, corrupt people behind the government that prevails in San Diego.

There are many years' worth of sub-stories of improper conduct and legal violations (at taxpayer cost) linked to Development Services (esp. Kelly Broughton, now at DSD in Chula V; Filner got rid of him, thank goodness, but that hasn't deterred DSD's progress on the dark side), Sanders, and the DCAs under Goldsmith.

The bad acting continues under Faulconer, business as usual. Citizen lawsuits and outside investigations (e.g., HUD looking at CDBG money improperly used by DSD and the council, with the City Attorney's knowledge) have been the only deterrents and have had any any impact. It sickens me that Kamala Harris has not been willing to risk her political future by doing what needs doing.

Ed Luna is a solid man and one of the few honest officials in San Diego. He must have a really perfect private life, or the same people who took down Filner would have eliminated Luna already. In any case, he'd better be very cautious.

2

Don Bauder July 30, 2014 @ 9:19 p.m.

HonestGovernment: As I recall, Development Services was created by Susan Golding, who was completely in the pockets of the business community. Before, the department under a different name actually made intelligent decisions that took the environment into account. That went out the window.

Frankly, with the water crisis as bad as it is (but San Diegans not told about it), there should be a moratorium on development and the department shut down. Best, Don Bauder

0

Visduh Aug. 2, 2014 @ 3:43 p.m.

Aguirre is so on target. Today, while traveling west along Poway Road, my wife commented about how rough it was and about the broken pavement. She wondered why it got so bad after it had been so good farther east. Well, at that point we were in Sabre Springs, not Poway. The difference was between Poway and San Diego, and it was a stark difference. The same thing happens on Pomerado Road. In Poway it is well surfaced and smooth. In SD, rough and broken and very bumpy. SD has a massive and documented backlog of street repair. Faulconer talked about it as a priority during the election campaign. I've seen or heard of nothing being done since then. That means that it is further deteriorating now.

0

Don Bauder Aug. 3, 2014 @ 8:07 a.m.

Visduh: As mayor, Jerry Sanders said he was balancing the budget. All he was doing was spending no money on infrastructure and maintenance. (He also slashed services --- fire, police, libraries, etc.) That is NOT balancing a budget, although I don't know how many San Diegans figured it out.

Faulconer ran on a platform of doing something about the infrastructure. Did he intend to do that? I doubt it. Best, Don Bauder

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close