Escondido Boulevard and Valley Parkway light.
  • Escondido Boulevard and Valley Parkway light.
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

After a presentation by Escondido city staff last Wednesday, city council voted to let the city’s contract with Redflex expire in December 2013 and terminate police enforcement of photo-recorded red light violations.

In 2003, the city entered into a five-year contract with Redflex, a traffic systems developer from Phoenix, AZ, to lease equipment and provide support. Between 2004 and 2006, red light camera systems were installed at seven intersections around the city, four of which are on Valley Parkway. The contract was renewed for an additional five years in 2008 and will expire on Dec 12, 2013.

Since the camera systems were installed, accidents at those seven intersections were reduced by about 30%. However, during the last five years, the city also improved safety at other intersections; left turn phases of lights were created, improved signal coordination achieved, retro-reflective backplates installed, etc. As a result, the accident rate reductions at Redflex red light intersections were not very different from accident rate reductions at other intersections city-wide.

Last year, the city paid Redflex about $627,000 and raised only $450,000 in ticket revenue with a net cost to the city of about $177,000. Other safety improvements made by the city cost significantly less and provided at least as much additional safety for drivers. In light of the cost and lack of additional safety benefit, it was felt the program has essentially run its course.

Ending enforcement of violations generated by the red light cameras was supported by Police Chief Craig Carter. In his first appearance before the city council as police chief, Carter said “If the council’s direction is to terminate the contract at December 12, then I will be leading my staff to stop issuing citations immediately.”

As part of the unanimous decision, councilman Morasco said, “In lieu of the fact that there are alternatives that at least statistically appear to be better than what we’re getting with the red light cameras and perhaps more cost effective as well, [let the program lapse].”

With a final comment before the vote, Mayor Abed said, “For me it has never been a financial exercise — this is about the lives we save with this program. This is about public safety, period. It seems now that these [Redflex] intersections are like any other intersections.”

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

Comments

Ken Harrison Aug. 26, 2013 @ 4:11 p.m.

Sorry Mayor Sam, its always been about the money. If not the money made by cities, then the money it costs its angry citizens when they get a $600 ticket (after fines, fees, and traffic school.) It always about the money. Only when the city starts to lose money, it costs more to have them than not, does a municipality address the issue, as Escondido did, preceded by L.A., Fullerton, San Diego, and San Juan Capistrano. They lost money, and shut down their programs.

Facts are most red light tickets were not for running through red light intersections, but for making a right turn and not coming to a complete stop at a light, far different than the death and doom these cameras were supposed to prevent.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close