Robert Brians was arrested after he confronted a snooping Imperial Beach code compliance official in the alley behind his house.
  • Robert Brians was arrested after he confronted a snooping Imperial Beach code compliance official in the alley behind his house.
  • Image by Alan Decker
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

There is a multicolored slide, part of a jungle gym, in Robert Brians’s front yard on Delaware Street in Imperial Beach. But I am admiring his two large African turtles crawling along the dusty ground. Children who come to Kristen Brians’s day-care center like watching the turtles, too, not to mention the lizards and geckos in cages inside the house. But despite the business operating out of the Brians’s home for more than 12 years, the couple is worried about their future in the neighborhood.

A pair of African turtles patrols Robert Brians’s front yard,

It’s hard to pry my attention away from the turtles and look north up Delaware where Robert Brians is now pointing. “There at the end of the block,” he says, “I saw the pickup turn in the direction of the alley that runs behind my house.” The 38-year-old Brians recognized the City of Imperial Beach truck and guessed where it was going. “I went to the back of my property, where the alley comes out, and saw the guy standing in the bed of the truck taking pictures into my neighbor’s backyard two houses away. So I took a picture on my cell phone of him taking his pictures. And I yelled, ‘What the f* are you doing? That’s illegal. I caught your ass this time.’ Then he jumped down, backed the truck up, and left the way he came.”

Tommy Simmons, an Imperial Beach code compliance officer, has a different story, which is told in a California Code of Civil Procedure document filed by the City of Imperial Beach. The document is called “Petition for Orders to Stop Workplace Violence” — a petition to the court for a restraining order. According to the document, filed on July 28, two days after the incident, Simmons was in back of a house under investigation for a building code violation on Delaware Street when Brians “entered the alley and began calling [Simmons] by curse words like ‘motherf*er.’” Brians told the official to leave. He “repeatedly threatened [Simmons] with physical assault,” states the document, “saying ‘I will break your face,’ ‘I’m going to break your legs,’ and ‘I’ll wring your neck like a chicken.’ [Brians] then advanced on [Simmons, who] retreated to his pickup truck and drove to the front of the property he was inspecting.” The report makes no mention of any photographs.

Robert Brians, who stands six foot five and weighs 250 pounds, denies advancing on the much smaller Simmons and threatening him. “In the alley, I stayed right behind my own property the whole time,” he says, now ready to tell me what happened next. “I went back out front and walked up to tell my neighbor Jim Cronk that a rat had been behind his house taking pictures of his yard.” Meanwhile, Tommy Simmons had parked across the street and gotten out of his truck. So Cronk went across the street to speak with the officer, and Brians continued up the street, where he showed the picture he had taken to a few neighborhood friends. On his way back to his own house, says Brians, he saw Cronk and Simmons still talking on the other side of the street. He says he did not cross over to speak with Simmons.

But the City’s petition maintains that Simmons had not gotten out of his truck on Delaware Street before Brians “ran to [the officer’s] new location while continuing to scream at him. The property owner told [Brians] to go away, and the property owner discussed the property’s condition with [Simmons]. During this discussion, Brians waited across the street, periodically waving his middle finger.…”

Again, Brians denies the belligerence, calling the document “a trumped-up false report.”

To cement its case, the City’s petition cites “a code violation” that Simmons issued to Brians in 2008 — and its aftermath. The summary says that a hearing officer eventually had to tell Brians to discontinue calling Simmons “improper names.” Whenever the two met in town thereafter, continues the narrative, Brians would call Simmons vulgar names and “would tell him to ‘get the f* out of town.’” Brians tells me the original citation, for $300, was for parking his two motorcycles on the grass while he cleaned out his garage. “Hell,” he says, “there’s a trailer down the street that’s always parked on the lawn and never gets ticketed.”

Eight days after the picture-taking incident, on August 3, the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department arrested Brians. He was leaving his house for a tile job that was to begin that morning. He was booked into county jail in downtown San Diego on one count of threatening death or bodily injury and one count of making a threat that prevents a public official from doing his job. After three days in jail, Brians was released on $25,000 bail. He has been assigned a public defender and is awaiting a trial whose date has yet to be set. The charges against him are known as “wobblers,” meaning that the court could treat them as either felonies or misdemeanors. If Brians is charged with felonies, he could be facing one conviction punishable by up to four years in state prison and another punishable by three years.

Brians’s assertion that it was Simmons who was breaking the law by taking pictures of his neighbor’s backyard is not likely to hold up. Code compliance laws vary among municipalities, often giving compliance officers greater leeway to inspect buildings and other structures than police officers have in criminal investigations. But staunch privacy advocates may want to take note.

“I don’t want somebody staring over my back fence, especially when my wife’s day-care kids are on the premises,” says Brians. “But at the time Simmons came here in 2008, before he cited me for the motorcycles, he had already gone up on his truck and taken pictures of the water connection to an RV I have parked just inside my fence. My property line goes all the way to the middle of the alley, so he was really in my yard without permission. The alley is for the use of all the residents whose backyards are next to it.”

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

Comments

Purocuyu June 25, 2012 @ 9:34 a.m.

Thia story could really use an update. When asking the city how they protect resident's privacy, the answer was referring to the case (we cant answer that, ongoing case etc.), but what is their policy in regard to everybody else, who isnt in a court case? That question wasn't answered, and really deseeved an answer. I have never crossed paths with that code compliance officer, but he is famous among residents. So how about an update?

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close