• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Twenty feet south of the intersection of Market and 14 streets in the East Village is a yellow street sign affixed to a pole. In black capital letters, the sign reads “Senior Citizen Facility.”

The Potiker Family Senior Residence, built in 2003, offers 200 affordable housing units for low-income seniors aged 62 and older, as well as mental and social support for its residents, nearly 30 percent of whom have been homeless at one time.

Across 14th Street from Potiker’s entrance is a metal gate covered with thin bamboo fencing to block the view. Inside the gate, a former parking lot has been refashioned into a meeting area. White chairs face a small lectern. Three older buildings surround the space. They house recently released prisoners who are on parole for drug offenses and are transitioning from prison drug rehab to community-based treatment. The all-male facility, called the Lighthouse, is a temporary home for up to 100 men. And the meeting area is where they sit down for group treatment and therapy sessions.

Last year, a nonprofit group called Shelter Partnership, dedicated to ending homelessness in Los Angeles, named Potiker Family Senior Residence as one of the nation’s five best practice models to aid understanding of mixed-population housing for both homeless people and low-income households. The report included a paragraph about the proximity of Potiker to the drug treatment facility: “A strong neighborly relationship has also developed between residents at Potiker and residents at the halfway house located across the street, with halfway house residents taking a protective stance towards the seniors.”

But while most of Potiker’s residents would agree that the Lighthouse residents are protective, many also say they are loud and intimidating. For those whose windows open out to 14th Street, the noise from the Lighthouse keeps them up late into the night and rouses them from sleep early in the morning.

“Anna,” a 70-year-old resident of Potiker, stops her electric scooter a block south of the front entrance to her building. She asks that her real name not be revealed. She looks around for anyone who might overhear us. “They start every morning around six with a group shout from 50 or 60 men. Roll call is the beginning of our day. They fight, swear, and show a general disregard for those within earshot.”

Anna’s voice quavers. She looks around again as though she were an informant trading classified secrets. “If they took ‘mother-effer’ out of the vocabulary, they wouldn’t have anything to say,” she complains. “Once I counted ‘motherfucker’ 15 times in five minutes.”

Anna pulls out a small video recorder from a bag strapped around the back of her seat. She presses play and scrolls through 47 recordings of Lighthouse residents yelling on the sidewalk and talking during group meetings. She has recorded the noise infractions for over a year.

The recordings range in length from 20 to 40 seconds. Some were made just before dawn. Male voices shout out names. It sounds like a roll call in a correctional institution.

“Car wash, car wash, c’mon, you need one. We need donations. Car wash, car wash…c’mon” was captured on one recording last summer.

On another recording made at night, two men can be heard shouting at each other. “Why you wanna do that? Do you wanna live or die? Fuck you.”

“Those are only just a few,” Anna says as she scrolls through the video library.

Since Anna moved into her small studio apartment, which looks out onto 14th Street, the noise has disturbed her. The profanity and the shouting frighten her. She cranks up the volume on her television to drown out the noise, but it isn’t enough. She sleeps with the TV set blaring. She’s tried closing her window, but that cuts off air circulation.

Anna is not the only person bothered by the loud noise from across the street. On May 20, she sat down at a sidewalk table outside the nearby Albertsons with two of her neighbors to discuss the noise from the Lighthouse.

Will Booth is 70 years old. He is tall, lean, and outspoken. He wears a navy blue Padres hat, a T-shirt, and jeans. He looks upset. He holds a five- by eight-inch notebook.

“Three buildings surround the meeting area, and it amounts to a megaphone or a funnel effect,” explains Booth. “It just shoots all the noise straight to us. They start at 6:30 every morning. They get rowdy and they get loud. There are 50 to 60 people there. They get very confrontational during these therapy sessions, dropping F-bombs and mother F-bombs and a bunch of other crap language. Most of them are yelling at the top of their lungs.

“There’s not much you can do,” he continues. “These rooms are all studios. I have to crack my door open and open my window in order to get any cross-ventilation. It’s as if they have no concept of what ‘neighbor’ means.”

Booth opens his notebook and flips to a page full of pen scribbles. He has gone to the local law library to do research on the feasibility of filing a lawsuit, that is, if he can find a lawyer willing to work pro bono. He reads a brief passage from the California Civil Code. “A nuisance is a wrong arising from the unreasonable, improper, indecent, or unlawful use of property to the annoyance or damage of another, or the general public.”

“They are yelling at the top of their lungs,” he says. “This isn’t conversational. They are seriously shouting. Even the leaders are loud. It’s a nuisance.”

“And it goes on all day too,” adds “Abe,” an 80-year-old neighbor who is also at the table. Abe has lived at Potiker the longest. He says noise has always been an issue for him but there’s not much he can do about it so he manages to “tune it out.”

Anna thinks that the reason he can tune it out is because he is hard of hearing.

The three residents say that others in their building complain about the noise but are too scared to come forward. They claim that staff at Potiker refuses to help, telling them that they have to file noise complaints with the police. Involving the police, says Anna, is too much for many of her elderly neighbors.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from the web

Comments

incognito July 22, 2010 @ 2:15 p.m.

You can sue them in Small Claims Court because tenants have a right to 'quiet contentment' by law. Furthermore, include the landlord in the claim as a defendent for refusing to take action to protect your right of quiet contentment. I recommend writing an amicable letter to the offending facility asking them to resolve the violation and a separate one asking the landlord to resolve it. you'll need written documentation in Court that you have attempted resolution (send everything Certfied with Return Receipt) thru normal channels. Be sure to state the violation but you don't mention that you intend to sue. Sue for the maximum amount Small Claims Court allows. Only the people with the guts to sign the letters will share when damages are awarded so people will have to step up. Oh, and please don't forget to send me a reward for this valuable legal advice. Good Luck. Ava

0

sadsenior Aug. 2, 2010 @ 11:13 a.m.

It is sad to reach a time in ones life when one should have quiet enjoyment and all the seniors get at this facility is foul language and staff that do not care. They put on a good front when donors come, to show all is well. They interview new residents who have yet to see the truth to show how wonderful the place is. They even have a residents board that is ineffective....they to bow to the management or Senior Community Center (Paul Downey)....The Potiker is a front for the people running the place to get high salaries in nice air conditioned offices with underground parking. While the seniors have to compete with the Padres fans for street parking and walk long distances to find a space...those who are lucky enough to still have a car. The able bodied employees get the underground parking. The only rooms that are well airconditioned are the offices, halls and empty meeting rooms while the residents are trapped in their sweltering little rooms with one window. No circulation ....can't open their doors do to the theft etc. Also the halls smell like ashtrays, urine etc. and the smokers are millitant about their rights. There is no place for nonsmokers to go...The roof patio always has a band of smokers and their lovely little garden is also a hangout for smokers both staff and residents. The smoke just floats in to the rooms above. All the nonsmokers suffer from second hand smoke. It is everywhere and there is nowhere to go to get away from it. I have heard non smoking staff are unhappy about the second hand smoke they are subjected to while walking the halls. Complaining is met with retribution and the seniors there are just plain stuck. The other housing in San Diego is many years wait. At Potiker they have smokers on Oxygen...there have been several incidents of ignition. It not only costs the city in sending out fire engines but the rents keep going up because of damage do to fire. The management does not like the fire dept to come and they had had some serious thing happen when they try to put fires out themselves. A 26 minute response for a fire is not accepptable. It is not a safe wonderful place to live as portrayed..... They lie and coverup to the law about goings on ...there have been stabbings and mugging in the building. The staff lie about residents and one in particular has bragged that management will always believe her not a resident. They lie about the rooms and building to prospective residents. The donors never see what is really going on. And the bugs....what a nightmare. I don't even go to visit my friend there anymore because of the bugs let alone the shouting and swearing one has to endure going there from the facility across the street! This is the tip of an iceberg that needs looking at! Glad I knew someone there before my lease ran out and I was tempted by their facade. Good to see someone has tackled at least one part of the residents misery. Thank you...

0

Gina Larson Aug. 5, 2010 @ 7:19 a.m.

Incognito: I learned a lot from your post. I wanta thank you for sharing. I am dealing with sort of the same legal issue, (bad management, unethical employees) at an apartment complex in San Diego. Case-wise the people at Potiker would seem to have a lot of things on their side. They just need to get a move on and start the legal process.

They should use digital recordings of statements made in public, which I believe would be admissable in court. I've been using an Olympus digital voice recorder. If you're creative it's very easy to hide. It's so small that sometimes no one notices it in your hand, although on a rare occasion a sharp individual will spot it. No matter, you can tape it to your body underneath light clothing.

I use an Olympus (the VN-960) that's an absolute wonder in that it has been super reliable over the years and has never given me any trouble despite being used on a daily basis. Olympus discontinued the VN-960. Recordings are a great way to catch unethical business people in the act of violating the law. I called Olympus a few days ago to find an equivalent model because like a spare tire for your car back ups are crucial when you're on the lower bottom of the totem pole and you're gathering evidence against someone with mucho power who's perched at the top of the totem pole. And when you're seriously outnumbered. And when you're dealing with people who have power who think they're above the law, laws written by lawmakers for a good reason.

The Olympus VN-6200 is the equivalent model to my VN-960. I don't work for Olympus. But like those senior citizens I'm in a war that I really don't want to fight but have no choice in that I must fight. And when you're at war you need the best tools to get the job done especially when the balance of power between the two combatants is grossly uneven. And thus I hope they're reading this, I hope I helped them in their cause and I hope I saved them some time in searching for the right tool in that big haystack a.k.a. the Internet.

I was reading a review at Amazon that was written by a cop. He was reviewing an Olympus digital voice recorder he had purchased. He said that he turns it on at the beginning of his shift and then tucks it in his pocket. He then turns it off at the end of his shift. That's a smart thing to do considering the great propensity supposed honest people have for lying at the drop of a dime. And I, based on my experience, include in that category those that are inveterate church goers who go to Sunday school once a week to be schooled on issues that pertain to morality and honesty, but yet don't appear to put into practice what their spiritual leader teaches them.

If the senior citizens at Potiker can find a good, competent, reasonable judge then it would appear that they'd have a good case that they just might win. I wish them well. I hope they take action. And I hope they win.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close