Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Pay the DJ
So what you're saying is that Skot Norton is the only person on the other side of this? There was no one else who could give the other side to any of this story? I find that hard to believe. The reporter didn't mention anyone else refusing to discuss the case. Meanwhile, I don't see how any of this is worth $3000. And speaking of which, don't these cases normally have non-disclosure clauses? How did Ken find out about the settlement?— July 2, 2009 11:13 a.m.
Pay the DJ
Why does this feel like such a slanted piece? This sure looks like one of those frivolous lawsuits that was cheaper to pay off than to fight. If there is a bad guy here, it seems to be Jay who took advantage of the system to make a few bucks.— July 1, 2009 4:48 p.m.