Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Following the Money in District 3
Exactly my point. I was demonstrating Fred's flawed logic by using Reducto Ad Absurdum. He continually argues that because there is a connection between two people, both must necessarily agree on an issue. For instance, Fred says that because a former Manchester employee donated to Todd Gloria, Gloria must support Manchester and the causes (like Prop 8) that Manchester supports. I say that because Fred blogs on a site owned by a supporter of Parental Notification, Fred must support the owner, and his campaign against a Woman's right to choose. Because both statements reach absurd conclusions, their logic is flawed. Hopefully Fred will realize this and stop putting up poorly thought out posts. By the way, notification is just an attempt to chip away at a woman's right to privacy. If it is passed, activists will use it to sue clinics and shut them down through litigation.— October 3, 2008 5:31 p.m.
The Mike Aguirre Show
Unlike the other candidates, Stephen Whitburn showed his ignorance of how preservation can actually get done in San Diego. Whitburn showcased his inexperience by stumbling over questions about the Mills Act and the department of Development Services. The only thing Whitburn knows how to do is hold a press conference...— October 3, 2008 5:19 p.m.
Following the Money in District 3
Fred, You're logic is warped. To demonstrate, ask yourself why you support parental notification for Abortion? You say you don't? Well you must, because you blog for a magazine who's publisher has bankrolled current and past propositions to require parental notification. Thus, you are anti-choice and anti-woman. The truth is that a $270 contribution won't buy a candidate. What buys a candidate is over $100,000, like Stephen Whitburn "loaned" his campaign. No evidence on where that money came from. And no justification for the loan rather than a contribution. Whitburn will pay himself back once elected, depriving you the chance of investigating who is contributors are. Wise up Fred. You've become a tool for Whitburn and his pal DeMaio.— October 1, 2008 3:56 p.m.