Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Too Late
Dear forensiclawyer & wife, Thank you so much for your kind words and heartfelt wishes. That alone is more than enough to "warm our house". Your kindness and generosity are greatly appreciated. Best regards to you and your wife, David— August 9, 2011 11:15 p.m.
Romantic Industrial
Dear Magpie, Thanks for the comment and link. I have been checking out the blog and there is some good stuff there!— July 7, 2011 7:13 a.m.
Photography Is Not a Crime
Viva, If you are out taking pictures of the 4th of July parade, or if an aircraft carrier returns to port from a tour of duty and you are covering the event, do you ask the permission of everyone in the photos? If you are taking a photo of traffic on the 5, do you ask each car owner's permission? If you photograph a high-rise condo, or suburban street, do you get the permission of each condo or home owner? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I hope you can see my point. And, as Barb has repeatedly said, when the father told her "she was not allowed" to take pictures of his kid, she wasn't a jerk -- she obliged him. But then we had a discussion about it with him because he is also a photographer and says that he always gets model releases. We told him that in many cases he didn't need to.— June 11, 2011 3:46 p.m.
Signed the Lease
Evey, Yes, of course we will be fine. We are lucky that we will have 1K sq. ft. to ourselves. So many people are much less fortunate. The only trick for us is that Barb and I also both work from home so we have to figure out how to wedge our office space in without making our "home" feel like an office. ;)— May 31, 2011 1:19 p.m.
Ratios
MINOR PREFERENCES - part III A creature of habit, it makes me happy to take a lunch break and go to my local Subway on El Cajon Blvd. Carlos, El Jefe del Emparedado, knows exactly what I like, because my order NEVER changes (with the exception of the recent, and very bold, additions of pickles and olives to my turkey creation). The same bag of chips – Miss Vickie’s Jalapeno flavor – is the perfect match. So perfect, that if the restaurant is out of them, I skip the sandwich altogether. My system of selecting and rationing chips is so complex, even I don’t completely understand it. It was during a typical visit to Subway that David discovered yet another one of my *minor* preferences. He always knew there was something odd in the way I consumed my lunch – a subtle, mystical pattern operating below the surface of our mid-day repast. This day he was eyeing my hands closely, trying to break the code. Aware of his attention, I feared for my chips. I don’t mind if he takes one when I’ve just opened the bag, because I can adjust the soft/crunch, spicy/mild ratios to compensate for the loss. However, once past the Sandwich Failsafe Point (when I can count the remaining chips at a glance), losing one spells dining disaster. David’s hand moved toward my pile of Miss Vickie’s best, scooping up a chip. Instinctively, my hand shot out and clutched his wrist as I commanded him to release his tasty prey. When I realized what I had done, I felt guilty, humiliated, exposed as a greedy miser of crispy goodness – how could I not share my last bite with the man I love? I beseeched him with puppy dog eyes to understand my plight as my mouth told him to “back off, Buster, I’ve got plans for those.” His look of shock and hurt quickly gave way to a visage of queer understanding. He released the chip, even as I begged him to take it, the recognition of my inappropriate behavior overriding any sense of taste preference I had just moments before. “No, babe, it’s okay, I don’t need it. I know it’s just one of your OCD things, and I don’t want to disturb whatever formula you have going on there.” Intent on explaining my selfishness, I told him about my ratios; how particular combinations maximize the pleasure I derive from my simple lunch. Then I said, “NOT OCD. Minor preferences.” He smiled that knowing smile, and nodded his head. “Sure, babe. Whatever you say.”— May 25, 2011 8:56 a.m.
Ratios
MINOR PREFERENCES - part II One time, David and I were out for a stroll in our Kensington neighborhood. As we walked, chatting about our day, he paused in the conversation to ask, “What are you doing?” “What are you talking about?” was my deft reply. “I’m not sure, it’s something in your step… did you just go out of your way to avoid walking on that line?” Playing dumb seemed ineffective, so I chose to fess up. I explained to my baffled lover that I wasn’t exactly “avoiding” the lines, as much as I was ensuring that my feet passed over them sequentially. He looked befuddled, so I spelled it out for him: “I am adjusting my step so that my feet fall over these lines alternately. Right, left, right, left, without the same foot passing over the lines twice in a row. Okay?” David smiled at me. A moment later, three syllables escaped from behind his Cheshire cat grin – “O. C. D.” Determined to make him understand that my choices are not the result of a “disorder,” I returned his grin with a smirk and spoke for the first time the words that would become my mantra of rationalization – “Minor Preferences, beh beh. I don’t need my feet to step alternately over these cracks. I prefer to walk this way. So you see, I don’t have OCD, I have minor preferences, like everyone else. Like the way you prefer one radio station over another, it’s as simple as that.” This may have made him laugh, but he had no argument, and I considered the battle won. But the war waged on. Months later, I would again unsheathe my mantra in self-defense. Ascending the stairs at home, I muttered complaints to myself regarding the number of steps – 15, an odd number. David said he had never noticed how many stairs there were. Then, narrowing his eyes, he asked me why it mattered. I confessed that it bothers me when I can’t climb a set of stairs beginning with my right foot and ending with my left. It’s not as important for me to start with my right as it is for me to end with my left, so when encountering a staircase, I can tell at a glance whether or not it’s “safe” to begin with my right foot. He actually pointed at me as he cried, “OCD!” I remained calm. “No, darling, what I meant was, I *prefer* to end with my left foot. It’s not the end of the world if I can’t – certainly I’d be able to get on with my day.” It’s true, I can suppress the urges when situations require conformity, but not without distress. When David wants to toy with me outside of the bedroom, he’ll give me a sloppy kiss on one of my cheeks and refuse to kiss the other. This game has become familiar: I struggle to get his head into a position that allows me to press my un-kissed cheek against his whisker-framed lips -- he strains to deny me the sensation I crave, laughing, always laughing, until either I succeed, or he gives in. I admit I have fun with these games, partly because I *know* that my so-called strange urge will be sated. But not every situation is as preferable as I would like.— May 25, 2011 8:55 a.m.
Ratios
MINOR PREFRENCES by Barbarella “But society has now fairly got the better of individuality; and the danger which threatens human nature is not the excess, but the deficiency, of personal impulses and preferences.” – John Stuart Mill “Careful, the plate is hot,” she warned, before placing my dinner on the table, obviously unaware of the real danger of putting anything of extreme temperature (hot or cold) within my grasp. Reaching for the fork, my left thumb knuckle inadvertently brushed against the searing ceramic. As the sting of the burn ebbed, I *intentionally* brushed my right thumb against the plate. Still feeling uneven, working on compulsion, I deliberately touched each thumb to the plate again, applying equal amounts of pressure. I took a deep breath, steeling myself for the familiar urge that would direct every other finger to take its turn with the hot plate, but it never came. I sighed with relief, picked up my fork, and did my best to ignore David’s knowing smile. Early in our relationship, when I explained my symmetrical requirements, David was quick to turn my “issues” into a form of amusement. He still does. Just the other night, I was lying comfortably in bed, on the edge of sleep, when I felt it – a short puff of air that finished with a subtle pressure on the back of my left hand. I tried not to move. I knew that if I opened my eyes, I would see him watching me, waiting for me to “perform.” I don’t *have* to do it, I told myself. As if he read my mind, David said, “Yes you do.” I don’t *have* to… but I *want* to. Convinced of my self-control, I turned away from him (hoping he would think I was simply changing positions to enhance my comfort) and casually exhaled, fast and hard, as quietly as possible, on the back of my *right* hand. Missing nothing, David giggled, earning himself a healthy slap; this only made him laugh harder. I’ve never been, nor will I ever be, “diagnosed” with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). I’m not debilitated by my urges and impulses, as was Jack Nicholson’s character in "As Good As it Gets". I find it odd that more people haven’t discovered the peace of mind that comes with maintaining a sense of order, however arbitrary and insignificant it may seem. I’ve heard it said that “victims” of OCD are subconsciously seeking to bring an element of control to their lives, which may otherwise be lacking. But despite being an avowed control freak, I don’t believe that the specific things I do are manifestations of a perceived lack of control. I don’t think of OCD (or at least my diluted version of it) as a “problem.” As one might choose yellow over orange, I *choose* to do these “crazy” things.— May 25, 2011 8:53 a.m.
Ratios
The root of this story was that I find it continually fascinating to see how many involuntary behaviors (tics, idiosyncrasies, OCD habits, etc.) are shared by Barbarella and her sister Jane. The thing with the ratios is of constant amazement to me. I have long known that Barb had this particular "minor preference" as she calls it. The way it works is that she must (MUST!) have the perfect number of chips per bites of her sandwich -- each savory bite accompanied by the crunch of a chip. When the ratio is off, anxiety quickly takes hold. If Barb has made her sandwich and laid out her chips and I snatch one early in the process of her meal, she may not be happy about it but she can still make the necessary mental adjustments and compensate. However, it I steal a chip from her plate late in the game, all hope is lost, and she kinda freaks out. Which brings me around to my original point... I thought this behavior (along with the food-will-soon-be-happening "happy dance" their bodies both, involuntarily launch into at the prospect of an imminent meal) was unique to Barb, but Jane suffers from this affliction too! Barb's story above is in response to my lunchtime experience with Jane a couple of days ago. Jane, who often stops by to do some of her work at or place, had made herself a sandwich with chips. Just after she finished preparing her plate, I happened by and plucked one of the chips off her plate. And that's when I saw it. The oh-so-familiar flash of panic in the eyes that I had come to recognize in Barb. I saw Jane's eyes dart from me to her plate then over to the bag of chips on the counter. I immediately knew what had happened. Grabbing one of Jane's chips had thrown off *her* ratio, and her reaction was instantaneous and visceral. Sheer panic, until she was able to ascertain that another chip was available to fill the void left by the one I had nabbed from her plate! Years back, Barbarella wrote a column titled, "Minor Prefererences". It is no longer archived on the Reader's site so, for your reading pleasure, I am taking the liberty of posting it below in segments. David— May 25, 2011 8:51 a.m.
War Paint
MsGrant, To say, "I don't think something like that should be brought up either, if you don't know the person - or even if you do... The feminist in me also says "enough". We women get judged far too often on our appearance alone as if it is indicative of character... When I think of how obsessive I was about appearance back in my early thirties I am ashamed. Live and let live. Society should not judge people based on their makeup or lack thereof. It is how you conduct yourself that matters." AND THEN to go on to say to Barbarella, "I remember the only time I met you in person. I looked down and was shocked. Most do not know that you are overweight." has got to be the most hypocritical thing I have heard since Ted Haggard preached that homosexuality was an abomination. And just to recap the facts, Barbarella, unlike yourself, never said ANYTHING to ANY of the women, and she kept the women's names anonymous to boot.— March 6, 2011 9:20 p.m.
Stupid Chick's Lucky
Yes Jeep, the video and the column are EXACTLY what they are -- they are both entertainment pieces. Neither is meant to be a definitive, legal description of the events. That's what the police report is for.— February 7, 2011 3:05 p.m.