Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
SANDAG's Uptown bikeway plan not widely accepted
It makes no sense for the City to do pedestrian improvements on 4th and 5th now, when we know that the Regional Bike Corridor will change them within a couple of years. Money twice spent. Better to have the pedestrian improvements rolled into the Uptown Regional Bike Corridor and build the pedestrian improvements once - not twice.— January 15, 2014 8:10 a.m.
Mid-City Rapid Transit: A Rapid Waste: NOT What We Voted For!
The Transnet Tax Extension we passed in 2004 requires projects like this accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. The current design on Park Blvd does not. This looks to be the classic case of designing a road for traffic efficiency only, disregarding the other modes, and ignoring the safety implications for all users (including cars). It is 2011, correct? If I didn't know better I'd think it was 30-40 years ago given the mindset (think Mission Valley). Call Todd Gloria and SanDAG. They know better, and should be reminded of who their clients and constituents are.— June 6, 2011 10:07 a.m.