DT73
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
San Diego plays big role in Field of schemes
Response to #38: I have always wondered: What is the accounting manuver that allows an organization to claim they are having financial trouble. Recently Moores claimed they were still paying for the Bruce Henderson lawsuits. They don't have to open their books to the public. What accounting report are they hiding and what would it show. Also, what is the difference between what they report and the reality that they will not show? Dave— April 8, 2008 8:39 p.m.
San Diego plays big role in Field of schemes
I remember reading Don's columns in the UT when the ballpark was being promoted. He would repeatedly point out that our tax dollars were badly needed for sewer repair and other infrastructure updates rather than being spent on corporate welfare. What really gets me about the Padres ownership/management is that they have worked to make baseball less accessible to the general public. Rather than building the ballpark in a Central location, such as Kearney Mesa, we have a downtown ballpark. Our citizens had complained that downtown was hard enough to navigate BEFORE the ballpark was built. Ticket prices have increased 69 per cent from the last year of Qualcomm. Yet the player payroll has increased by one half of one percent over the same period. The behavior of Padres ownership does not warrant an active fan base.— April 6, 2008 10:25 p.m.