• News Ticker alerts

Who is funding the big money recall effort to oust embattled San Diego mayor Bob Filner?

So far, no one is saying, and - unless someone steps forward to sue the city to force greater disclosure - that seems to be the way it will stay.

As reported by the Sacramento Bee, a similar case of hiding political donors there has drawn the interest of California's political watchdog agency, which yesterday sued a Los Angeles firm to force disclosure of the identities of those putting up the money for a putative referendum on public financing of a new basketball arena.

The Fair Political Practices Commission's suit against Loeb & Loeb charged that the high-powered firm has "failed and refused" to report the source of the money, despite warnings that it had violated the Political Reform Act by failing to meet a state financial disclosure deadline.

Petition workers have been in Sacramento since June seeking to collect 22,000 signatures for a proposed June 2014 ballot measure on sports arena subsidies.

The FPPC said in its complaint filed Thursday that Loeb & Loeb's "wrongful conduct will cause great and irreparable harm to the voters of Sacramento by denying them information regarding the source money spent to collect signatures in support of the effort to place the arena financing on the ballot."

"The information regarding the source of the $80,000 payment to Olson may be highly relevant to a citizen's decision whether or not to sign the petition supporting the initiative effort," the complaint reads.

In San Diego, where a recall campaign against Filner has recently taken shape, the public’s window into who is paying for the effort appears even more opaque.

When queried last week about what disclosure provisions would apply to those funding the recall, San Diego ethics commission executive director Stacey Fulhorst said via email that the issue was complex and required time to look into the matter.

We are currently conducting research on this issue. It's complicated because state law treats recalls as ballot measure elections, whereas the city treats them as candidate elections.

When asked yesterday via email for an update, Fulhorst sent a link to a "Fact Sheet on Recall Elections," newly posted on the commission's website.

According to that document:

The City of San Diego treats recall elections as candidate elections, unlike the state, which characterizes such elections as ballot measure elections. For this reason, the City’s laws concerning recall elections differ somewhat from those at the state.

The officeholder who is the subject of the recall and replacement candidates are subject to contribution limits.

On the other hand, committees that make independent expenditures to support or oppose the recall or replacement candidates are not subject to contribution limits.

Such committees include the recall proponents, other committees created to independently support or oppose the recall effort, and committees created to independently support or oppose the candidacy of one or more replacement candidates.

The document is silent about the date by which contributions to the recall signature effort have to be reported.

During a typical election campaign, contributions are required to be disclosed 24 hours after they are made, so that the citizenry may discover who is paying for the effort before they go to the polls.

But Fulhorst said in an August 7 email that it was her office's position that the requirement does not apply to recall signature drives, since they are not technically "elections."

24-hour reporting doesn't kick in until 90 days before an election. Since no election has been called yet, there is no 24-hour filing at this time.

The commission's recall "fact sheet" also says that the 24-hour reporting requirements would be mandated only "if the City Council sets a date for the recall election."

Fulhorst is currently out of the office and won't return until next week, according to her automated email response. We hope to get further details then.

Adding an extra level of intrigue to the story is the involvement of two heavy political hitters who have funding ties to some of the city's biggest media outlets, including San Diego State's public TV and radio stations, heavily backed with cash from Democratic La Jolla billionaire Irwin Jacobs.

His Republican counterpart is real estate developer, hotel mogul, and mega-millionaire Douglas Manchester, who owns U-T San Diego, the newspaper, web, and cable TV media operation that has made it clear it wants Filner out of office.

Both Jacobs and Manchester are longtime Filner foes, though with distinctly differing preferences when it comes to replacing him.

This past April Manchester was accused in an expose done by San Diego State University’s TV station KPBS and a related non-profit called inewsource of discounting 2012 campaign advertising to GOP then-city councilman Carl DeMaio, who was running against Filner for mayor.

This discrepancy — and others discovered by the inewsource and KPBS Investigations Desk — could violate campaign laws.

Filner's former campaign consultant Tom Shepard told the station:

“I’ve seen newspapers and television stations editorialize in favor and against my candidates, and I just kind of accept that as part of the game in political campaigns,” he said.

“I’ve never seen advertising given away to one candidate in preference over another. And my understanding of the state and local campaign laws, it’s not legal to do that.”

Manchester’s partner John Lynch denied the charges, and the FPPC subsequently found that no laws had been violated.

Will either of the city’s top two political guerillas weigh in with their substantial financial resources against Filner?

Rank and file San Diegans could be the last to know.

  • News Ticker alerts

Comments

monaghan Aug. 16, 2013 @ 11:19 a.m.

Thanks for the photos of the Joan and Irwin Jacobs Newsroom at KPBS. Also for the photo of the breathless KPBS softball-pitcher Amita Sharma, now famous for "interviewing" one of the damsels distressed by unwanted mayoral attention. (Sharma forgot to ask how come it took years for complainants to come forward.)

We already know about Manchester's U-T TV using its editorial staff for song-and-dance routines satirizing the Mayor. (I thought they were supposed to be worrying about the sullied reputation of this town which straight-faced boosters call America's Finest City.)

I'd like to see a picture of Ethics Commission jobholder Stacey Fulhorst so I can thank her if I see her on the street for extreme caution rendered while holding appointive public office. Well, maybe when she gets back from that vacation.

Deafening official silence around this disenfranchising of voters and hijacking of a citywide election would be criminal anywhere but San Diego. Where is the principled person who will sue the city to reveal the funders behind the attempted recall of Mayor Filner?

1

Yankeedoodle Aug. 16, 2013 @ 11:36 a.m.

Matt: Good story. I, too, enjoyed the mug shot of the KPBS newsroom. Most amusing in the context of current events and discussions of loyalties.

0

Duhbya Aug. 16, 2013 @ 12:02 p.m.

"Manchester’s partner Bill Lynch ...." I think you meant to type "John"?

0

jnojr Aug. 16, 2013 @ 1:07 p.m.

What difference does it make who's paying for the recall effort?

Let's pretend it's the most despicable group imaginable. So they fund a recall effort. The people will vote to keep Filner or throw him out. How is who was financing the campaign going to affect the outcome? If Republicans bring the money to the table, that somehow means the outcome is tainted?

For all you goofy Filner supporters, you should be happy to have the evil people finance the recall. After all, you're right... we should ignore his behavior. So they'll just be wasting their money.

Y'all sound like the Low Speed Rail to Nowhere idiots... "This is a really fantastic idea, but we cannot possibly revisit it! Nothing can be allowed to change! We must move FORWARD at full speed, even if 'forward' is towards a cliff, because avoiding the cliff would be 'backwards'!"

0

shirleyberan Aug. 16, 2013 @ 1:23 p.m.

You are the Idiot! We Voted Already. Did you see the first monstrosity building we'll be forced to accept. You don't get our choice is not to have developers like that here! You don't care about conspiracy theory or dirty play politics? What's wrong with you? Blind?

0

Diogenes Aug. 16, 2013 @ 10:56 p.m.

The last Filner victim says that she did not want to go on a date with Filner. Gloria Allred went too far with that one. We now know that Filner was being sarcastic with the vast majority of the victims. Not nice but not criminal.

The demographics of San Diego, if not the superiority of Democratic principles, will make it a Democratic city like Los Angeles and San Francisco. The right wingers will have to move to Orange County.

There are more registered Democrats. I hope the recall, if any, fails and those bankrolling it fail and are exposed.

There are now super-majorities in both chambers and a Democratic Governor. Prop 13 should be reversed to expand the tax base more equitably.

0

Founder Aug. 17, 2013 @ 11:49 a.m.

I liked the first part of what you said, especially about exposing those that are bankrolling the recall! But Forget the reversal of Prop 13, why not just raise Corp. taxes on those making over 25 million per year, that way those that can afford to pay a bit more taxes can and all those Seniors that bought into the American dream many years ago will not get taxed out of their homes, which for many is their only asset!

0

Founder Aug. 17, 2013 @ noon

In case anybody has not noticed, the QOL in SD is being trashed, and all our current Leaders (except for Mayor Filner) are not only looking the other way, but most are the ones facilitating it! That is one of the big reasons I have backed off from going to planning meetings, they are a sham! Big Development is taking over $an Diego and anyone that thinks differently is either not paying attention, part of the problem (NIMBY) or is politically naive.

There are Billions to be made all at the taxpayers expense, so expect to see many millions being passed out to gain political influence as the City is bought, lock, stock and barrel!

Again KUDOS to the Reader, for standing up for free speech in San Diego, for without it where would people turn for real news instead of feel good "fluff" stories designed to redirect us from what is going on under our noses!

0

monaghan Aug. 17, 2013 @ 3:36 p.m.

What's "QOL?" Are people here so inside and cool they really don't know to spell out the name the first time followed by an acronym in parens? Such as, Quorum of Liars (QOL) etc.

0

Founder Aug. 19, 2013 @ 2:21 p.m.

Sorry, you are right of course! Quality of Life (QOL)

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close