• News Ticker alerts

As the mystery of Utility Consumers' Action Network's dissolution announcement is explicated, as now appears likely, the spotlight is almost certain to turn to accounting. Was it phony? Will UCAN's new forensic accounting firm unravel the puzzle, or obfuscate it? One key question revolves around yearly gross revenues. The California government code requires charitable contributions with gross revenues of $2 million or more must be audited by an independent certified public accountant. UCAN reports show gross revenues under $2 million from 2004 onward until an upward spike to almost $3 million for the year ended midyear 2010. But whistleblower David Peffer says in a letter to attorney Paul Dostart, hired to purportedly examine whistleblower charges, that UCAN chief operating officer Robert Ames "exerted significant pressure on [the new forensic auditing firm]...to manipulate the books by changing accounting methods and changing the dates on which account balances were recorded in order to get revenue under the $2 million threshold...I was witness to at least one such conversation between Mr. Ames and a representative [of the forensic accounting firm]." Also, UCAN bookkeeper Tony Pettina told Peffer's lawyer Mike Aguirre that on multiple occasions UCAN collected more than $2 million in a given year, according to Peffer.

A truly independent auditing firm would have flagged the six accounts under the misspelled Utility Comsumers Action Network. One of those accounts had more than $262,000. Even though there were six such accounts in different financial institutions, Dostart told Peffer that "UCAN's board has accepted management's explanation that the account name misspellings were inadvertent oversights" and the accounts have been reconciled. Dostart found a total of only $42,000 in the accounts; that was before Aguirre found the document showing that there had been $262,000 in one account alone; that document has been shown on this page above.

A truly independent auditing firm would also have cocked an eyebrow at the $1 million that steelmaker Nucor gave to UCAN for the making of a movie blasting China. UCAN agreed to pass the $1 million to perennial San Diego political candidate Peter Navarro, now a professor at UC-Irvine, who was to make the movie based on a book he co-authored.

A truly independent auditing firm would also have asked questions about the money (said to be $1 million) that UCAN invested in a hedge fund run by a close associate of Navarro. Losses have been estimated at around $100,000. Such an investment might have been legal, but was certainly not prudent for a nonprofit.

Shames did not tell the board about Nucor's agreement to pass $1 million through Nucor for Navarro's film. I have heard from a reliable source that the UCAN board has not passed on $400,000 of that $1 million, and Navarro has been threatening to sue. One board member said the original deal smelled of money laundering. It is not clear if Shames told the board of the hedge fund investment.

  • News Ticker alerts

Comments

Visduh March 3, 2012 @ 8:09 p.m.

Ahh, the plot thickens. While part of the puzzle comes into clearer focus, we have more matters to consider. This story will be like removing layers from an onion; just when you think you have the center in sight, there are more layers.

Navarro should sue. Lawsuits with their discovery can reveal more than all this self-commissioned auditing.

0

Don Bauder March 4, 2012 @ 7:56 a.m.

It is interesting that, according to my source (a good one), Navarro is threatening to sue UCAN because it hasn't coughed up $400,000 of the $1 million that Nucor intended to run through UCAN for Navarro's production of a movie. This certainly suggests to me that Nucor, which is snug with Navarro, doesn't believe it has IRS problems for attempting to run the money through a nonprofit. Incidentally, Nucor, which was willing to talk for the August column, has not responded to my inquiries this time. Best, Don Bauder

0

Twister March 4, 2012 @ 12:44 p.m.

Let he who is without shame speak out?

0

Don Bauder March 4, 2012 @ 3:20 p.m.

Good point, good pun, Twister. As I have said, Dostart wrote a report June 8 of last year. In a discussion of the misspelled accounts (Comsumer instead of Consumer), Dostart stated this: "We could not confirm the Employer Identification Number (EIN) for the accounts from the referenced statements. More importantly, we cannot locate on the UCAN financial statements the balances of all the UCAN accounts for which we have statements."

Shames provided to Dostart and his assistants recent-month account statements for three of the four misspelled accounts. Then Dostart noted, "We cannot locate inclusion of the balances in these three wrongly named accounts on UCAN's QuickBooks balance sheet."

As the barbershop quartet sang while warming up, Hmmmmmmm." Best, Don Bauder

0

SurfPuppy619 March 4, 2012 @ 9:07 p.m.

This is a mystery tha needs solving, we need Scooby Doo and his crew to solve it!!!!!

0

Don Bauder March 4, 2012 @ 10:46 p.m.

I have been told by an insider that for several years, UCAN has been using every trick in the books to avoid an audit. Indeed, the intended dissolution may be an attempt to thwart an audit. If it is true that accounting tricks have been used to avoid an audit by keeping annual reported gross income below $2 million -- and those tricks continued under the reign of lawyer Bob Ames, who has been chief operating officer for many months -- this could get extremely interesting. There is a possibility that a high official in the attorney general's office has been compromised in the dissolution attempt. The attorney who may have done the compromising has been providing services to UCAN. Best, Don Bauder

0

Twister March 5, 2012 @ 1:59 p.m.

What we have here is a failure to excommunicate.

0

Don Bauder March 5, 2012 @ 6:03 p.m.

Leave it to Twister to summarize the essence of this in just a few words. Best, Don Bauder

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close