I just walked over to the corner store and saw the cover of the UT discussing how San Diego is scrambling to lock up 4 BILLION dollars in redevelopment projects in case the Governor shuts down redevelopment altogether in March. Four BILLION dollars at a time that we are being told if we don't vote to raise taxes we are going to experience painful cuts to services? There is something really really wrong when redevelopment agencies can lock up 4 billion dollars in a matter of days and schools and state parks are powerless to demand even the amount of money they received last year.

What exactly are these developers giving us that is so valuable we just can't live without it? The primary purpose of a redevelopment agency is to fix blight, but what exactly does that mean?

Image

Well, here it is. You might say "obviously this is a new project and just isn't activated yet with residents". No, actually this project has been fully operational since 2006 and most of the commercial spaces including this big corner anchor store lay empty and have been empty for years except for the homeless people that sleep in front of them. The website for the project bragged that Starbucks was their first tenant but even Starbucks could not survive the complete vacuum of activity this project created and shortly left. http://www.theboulevard.org/Projects.htm

So maybe the rest of the project is better.... Image

So maybe this is just a bad example of redevelopment. Maybe its an anomoly. Image

Actually this is an award winning project. It received an Award of Excellence from the National Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies (NALHFA). Hmmm that sounds a bit suspicious, an award from the agency that finances affordable housing. http://www.sandiego.gov/redevelopment-agency/pdf/renaissancenalhfaaward041708.pdf

Well I guess this is the best we are going to get. Can you imagine what the projects look like that didn't win any awards? Now imagine 4 billion dollars worth of identical projects all over San Diego. Its just common sense that it is impossible to revitalize a neighborhood with depressing lackluster buildings. I have seen this all over town: vapid cliched affordable housing projects that cannot attract any commercial tenants because people just don't like them. No one wants to go and have dinner at an uninspiring stucco Walmart style building.

I mentioned this project a few weeks ago when I wrote: Why Was Toni Atkins Consulting for Developers Vying for Redevelopment Dollars After She Was Elected to State Assembly? http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/ive-got-issues/2011/jan/27/why-is-toni-atkins-still-working-as-a-lobbyist-for/

This project is the famed Rennaisance project at El Cajon and 30th. It is a quintessential example of what this 4 billion dollars is buying us. And as if the building itself was not bad enough, as I mentioned in the last piece, a rare art deco building that housed Gustafson’s Furniture Store was razed in order to make way for this eyesore. It was developed by Tom Carter and Reese Jarrett who happen to be private clients of LeSar and Atkins per the client list on their website. Apparently the project was such a success Carter and Reese were allowed to develop another project behind it as an affordable housing project a few years later.
Image

And just so you know an affordable housing banal condo starts at $270,000 per the Reese Carter website. Doesn't that seem a bit high in this market? That is the subsidized price for the low income resident. Keep in mind they were given millions of dollars to offer the project at this price.

And it is not just this project that is destroying rare historic buildings and devestating neighborhoods, it is the vast majority of redevelopment projects, billions and billions of dollars worth. Money that is intended to "revitalize" neighborhoods is absolutely killing them. It isn't just that the money that is being used is creating blight, its that the money is quickly being used to destroy every last historic resource we have left. Its a double hit to our valuable neighborhoods. As the UT points out, developers and redevelopment agencies are scrambling to approve 4 billion dollars worth of projects by March 1st so that money will be locked away, locked away from schools, state parks, libraries and other things that add real value to communities to build more "Award Winning" projects like the one you see above. Is it really worth it?.

Comments

SurfPuppy619 Feb. 18, 2011 @ 2:09 p.m.

And just so you know an affordable housing banal condo starts at $270,000 per the Reese Carter website. Doesn't that seem a bit high in this market?

I have seen this scene repeated over and over and over and over again-times 1000- in gov. at every level.

Who remembers the $160 MILLION San Marcos trash recycle plant???

Gov should NOT be involved in "affordable housing",it is not affordable and the fraud in it is like all other gov boondoggles.

0

historymatters Feb. 18, 2011 @ 2:29 p.m.

Wow, I like that you are so up on all these matters. I just checked the LA Times article you referred to on Don's blog. Good call on that one.

Yes and people like Toni Atkins think that because they are using the word "affordable housing" that we are not going to realize this is about 1 thing profit. How can developers make the most money w/ the least effort and the answer is to destroy neighborhoods by building the lowest quality highest density garbage and then charging a premium. I have no doubt there is alot going on w/ this project, like the for profit condos are listed in the mid $500,000s!!!! What year is this??? I dont know what that is about. If maybe they have to say that is the market rate so they can rationalize the $270,000 for the affordable.

At any rate Atkins and her wife and their friends are being paid a premium to offer us these depressing housing slums and we better wake up because we are about to get alot more of them all along El Cajon Blvd in the Boulevard of the Arts project....yes this project is part of the Boulevard of the arts.

0

nostalgic Feb. 18, 2011 @ 2:48 p.m.

The millions are real money. People pay for it with taxes, today and tomorrow. It's our money. We have just forgotten about it because we never really had it.

0

nan shartel Feb. 24, 2011 @ 8:29 a.m.

good stuff I've Got Issues...thx for bringin' them to all of our attention ;=D

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close