• Scam Diego alerts

The Labor Department announced this morning (June 5) that the nation lost only 345,000 jobs in May; economists had expected 500,000 or more. However, the unemployment rate jumped from 8.9% to 9.4%. Puzzled? The jobs data come from a survey of employers. The unemployment number comes from a survey of households. The rise in the unemployment rate suggests that more people are looking for jobs. They were not included when they were not looking; now that they are, the unemployment rate goes up. On balance, today's report is moderately good news, but it is like other economic reports of recent weeks: somewhat less awful.

There are bad signs in the data. Total hours worked dropped 0.7%. The average workweek fell to a record low 33.1 hours. Bottom line: employers aren't hiring. Economists think that technically, the recession may end in this year's second half. But the unemployment rate won't return to its normal 5% until 2013. Almost nobody thinks the economy will spring back quickly -- there will be no V-shaped recovery. We'll probably crawl along the bottom for some time.

The stock market initially zoomed at today's employment announcement, then fell back to red figures, and now is up moderately. Stocks have jumped back more than 30% since their March lows, although are still down almost 40% from their 2007 peak. Why the recovery? It's a liquidity rally. The Federal Reserve is printing money, and will have to print more in the future. The government and the Federal Reserve have pumped $13 trillion into the recovery in various ways. This almost has to give buoyancy to stocks. Yesterday (June 4) was a prime example. The retailing news was utterly dismal. Consumer spending is 70% of the economy. Stocks ignored the news and rose again. With money expanding, the dollar weakening, and commodity prices rising, higher stock prices are likely in the short run. But watch out for the long run. The hangover from the massive deficits and money printing will come. I still think the Dow Jones Industrial Average will wind up the year at 9,000, but at some point the liquidity flow has to be reversed. Then watch out.

  • Scam Diego alerts

Comments

SurfPuppy619 June 5, 2009 @ 10:27 a.m.

Unemployment numbers are always cooked to make gov look good.

If any gov agency states an unemployment %, I usually double it for an honest accounting.

0

Don Bauder June 5, 2009 @ 11:51 a.m.

Response to post #1: Yes, unemployment numbers are cooked. One way: in the survey of employers, the government doesn't poll small business. So it makes an estimate for small business. That estimate is often inflated to bring the unemployment rate down. You say you usually double the reported rate to get an honest rate. Not a bad idea. The Labor Department's tally of unemployed that includes discouraged workers and those forced to take part-time positions results in a rate of 16.4% in May, up from 15.8% in April. Best, Don Bauder

0

WhatGoesAround June 5, 2009 @ 12:07 p.m.

Not only are employers not hiring, but potential employees -- mostly babyboomers -- are dropping out of the workforce to care full time for elderly family members, while at the same time depleting their own (babyboomers') savings. No amount of an elder's savings can outlast increased life expectancy and increased health care costs. This system will bankrupt us all.

0

SurfPuppy619 June 5, 2009 @ 12:11 p.m.

No amount of an elder's savings can outlast increased life expectancy and increased health care costs. This system will bankrupt us all.

By WhatGoesAround

Agreed.

The jig is up, all the entitlement ponzi schemes are now crashing and there is no saving them, we hit the point of critical mass.

SS will soon not apply unitl a person reaches age 70, 72, 75 or older-the money just isnot there.

0

Don Bauder June 5, 2009 @ 12:13 p.m.

Response to post #3: Yes, and people are entering retirement without any kind of nestegg. So they will turn to their children or to government. But Medicare is in bad financial shape and Social Security isn't far behind. Governments at every level are hurting financially -- California isn't alone. Because there are so many other nagging problems around, retirees' sorry state doesn't get discussed often. Best, Don Bauder

0

Don Bauder June 5, 2009 @ 12:15 p.m.

Response to post #4: Remember, George W. Bush wanted to set up a system whereby people would put Social Security funds into stocks. Mercifully, it was DOA. Think where we would be if that had gone into effect. Best, Don Bauder

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close