Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Archives
Classifieds
Stories
Events
Contests
Music
Movies
Theater
Food
Legal Guide
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
February 12, 2025
February 5, 2025
January 29, 2025
January 22, 2025
January 15, 2025
January 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
December 25, 2024
December 18, 2024
December 11, 2024
December 4, 2024
Close
Anchor ads are not supported on this page.
Congressman Bob Filner Stands Up for Medical Marijuana
Exactly what should a United States Congressman be doing about local corruption? He can jawbone all day while campaigning for Mayor but at the end of the day it's Ms. Dumanis that should be the one cleaning up that mess. Hey, maybe if she didn't spend so much of her time figuring out ways to violate her oath to uphold and defend the California State Constitution and to sabotage the will of the California voters on that ever so unimportant medicinal cannabis patient protection thing she'd have more time to prosecute actual criminals. Say annie, have you written Ms. Dumanis and told her to quit paying attention to such an unimportant issue? Or is it only unimportant when it's the advocates of medicinal cannabis patient protection talking? You just can't have it both ways. What part of the State Constitution has she repeatedly violated you ask? Article 3, Section 3.5 paragraph C. Presented verbatim: CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC. 3.5. An administrative agency, including an administrative agency created by the Constitution or an initiative statute, has no power: (a) To declare a statute unenforceable, or refuse to enforce a statute, on the basis of it being unconstitutional unless an appellate court has made a determination that such statute is unconstitutional; (b) To declare a statute unconstitutional; (c) To declare a statute unenforceable, or to refuse to enforce a statute on the basis that federal law or federal regulations prohibit the enforcement of such statute unless an appellate court has made a determination that the enforcement of such statute is prohibited by federal law or federal regulations. The law is the law? Yeah, right. Tell us another fairy story mommy.— December 28, 2011 8:33 p.m.