San Onofre
  • San Onofre
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Piling on to issues already faced by the failed San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station and the state agencies that regulate it, including the California Public Utilities Commission and the California Coastal Commission, nuclear watchdog group Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility has filed new public commentary critical of planning figures cited in the CPUC's 2015 Draft Integrated Energy Policy Report.

A first offense, says the group, is an assumption that San Onofre's former operator, Southern California Edison, will "complete the full decommissioning process within 20 years. California further requires the decommissioned plant site be restored to its original condition; this requirement involves additional activities beyond what the NRC may require."

Alliance counsel John Geesman argues that a true "decommissioning" of the plant involves removal of all spent nuclear fuel from the site and a restoration of the grounds to their natural state, a stipulation present in a long-term land lease with the Navy.

The rosy picture painted in the report can't be accurate, Geesman continues, because Edison uses "optimism premised on the federal government beginning to take delivery" of San Onofre's nuclear waste sometime in 2024, with all waste removed from the site by 2049 and an actual site decommissioning date of 2052 — that's 37 years from now.

Sources have predicted in the past that nuclear waste could end up sitting along San Diego's northern shoreline for as long as 600 years or more if plans to build a federal nuclear waste dump don't come through.

The delays in moving the radioactive waste off site could lead to massive cost overruns as compared to the CPUC's assumptions — according to Geesman, Edison says a ten-year delay in moving the waste would increase storage costs by $149 million (in 2014 dollars), and that a 100-year delay would cost upward of $1.5 billion.

Another argument hinges on Edison's contract with the Navy to return the land to its original condition before construction of the power plant. While Geesman says that ratepayer contributions to a decommissioning trust are sufficient, Edison "nevertheless is attempting to remove the requirement from a renegotiated agreement with the Navy....

"About 42 percent of the $346 million cost of compliance is due to the requirement that all clean concrete and demolition debris be disposed of at an out-of-state Class III landfill pursuant to State of California executive Order D-62-02.18.68," continues Geesman. "The final [report] should condemn any notion of abandoning subsurface debris, ineligible even for deposit in a California landfill, on what may one day become a heavily visited public beach."

The Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility then turns its attention to Diablo Canyon, the state's last active nuclear power plant, which itself is facing difficulties in trying to renew its operating license amid many of the same concerns that would have plagued San Onofre had it not failed before filing renewal applications, including questions about earthquake fault lines running close to the plant.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

eastlaker Nov. 19, 2015 @ 2:24 p.m.

At least someone is examining the situation.

I wish we could shout this from the rooftops, but there are already so many issues "out there" that it probably wouldn't be heard. Which might be what Sempra, SDG & E, Gov. Brown, the CPUC, So Cal Edison and all concerned and ineffectual parties are hoping for.

We need to keep on about this. There really needs to be a solution for nuclear waste. The medical community continues to need it for studies...so that even if all power plants shut down, there is still a need for what can be achieved via radioactive particles.

0

CaptD Nov. 20, 2015 @ 1:11 p.m.

SCE is (AGAIN) using its "connections" to the CPUC and the Govenor of CA to push yet more bogus proposal through that will not only make them money but will transfer all future expenses to ratepayers.

Said another way, SCE and SDG&E (who is a 20% minority owner and is also happily collecting money from their ratepayers) are repeatedly raping SoCal ratepayers since there seems that there is no way to stop them, yet.

Now #SanOnofreGate grows as ever more people start asking questions that only further point out, that the sale of Energy is rigged in CA, thanks to the Governor and his appointees in the CPUC. Elected Leaders are also part of the problem since they refuse to demand change because the Utilities are too powerful to cross.

SDG&E is a 20% owner of San Onofre, yet almost nothing is mentioned in M$M about that connection. NONE of their emails have been given to State investigators. This should have happened at the same time as SCE's emails were given up since SDG&E had to be a party to any settlement discussion...

I bet Governor Brown has quietly let it be known that he will pardon anyone found guilty, so everyone is looking the other way.

Expect to see much more about this "surface" very soon.

* The new hashtag that will allow you to keep up to date on the ongoing investigation into the multi-billion $ SCE-CPUC ripoff.

Part of the above was posted here: http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2015/nov/12/ticker-utilities-commission-reform-measures-soften/?c=194193

1

Sign in to comment

Win a $25 Gift Card to
The Broken Yolk Cafe

Join our newsletter list

Each newsletter subscription means another chance to win!

Close