A board of inquiry marveled at the glass-topped architecture and “spotless interiors” of Lomaland.
  • A board of inquiry marveled at the glass-topped architecture and “spotless interiors” of Lomaland.
  • Image by Michael Clark
  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Tingle, tingle, little star / Oft I wonder who you are. / What you do that isn’t right, / Every blessed, spooky night.

In mid-October, 1901, as Madame Katherine Tingley’s Universal Brotherhood gained popularity, the Los Angeles Times ran a series of vicious articles about her “crank institution” at Point Loma: “The Spook’s Nest,” “Startling Tales from Tingley,” “More Spook Debate.” The “Purple Mother,” who tours San Diego on the raised back seat of an open carriage, like a queen on her throne, has “denied the fatherhood of God.”

From September 6 through early October, the assassination and slow death of president William McKinley filled the pages of the Times. When the slayer, Leon Czslogosz, said Emma Goldman inspired him, Harrison Gray Otis — president, publisher, editor of the Times, and vice president of the Associated Press — went on a rampage against anarchists in general, and dangerous women like Goldman and Tingley, in particular.

According to the Times, Tingley was a tyrant responsible for “gross immoralities practiced by the disciples of spookism.” She said Americans were “overfed,” so her followers ate so little they became “ethereal.” She said Spot, her black cocker spaniel, was the reincarnation of William Q. Judge, former head of the Universal Brotherhood. “The most incredible things happen in that lair.”

Along with her claim that Christianity had become mere “churchianity,” the most disturbing was that the “Boss Spook” ordered children taken from their parents at a very early age. “There can be no question about a mother’s love,” Tingley wrote, “but sometimes by this very means mistakes are made that affect the mind of the young so materially that their power for good becomes dwarfed…by loving but unwise mothers.”

“Let me have a child from the time of birth until it is seven years old, and all the temptation in the world will not move it.”

At Lomaland, Tingley separated children from their parents shortly after they were born. Infants had a teacher/Godmother “day and night” so there was “no break between school and home life.” Parents could visit their children once every two weeks.

On October 8, William E. Griswold took the issue to court. He alleged that Madame Tingley detained his 16-year-old daughter, Bertha, “against her will.” When Bertha’s mother died in January, instead of moving to Denver to join her father, she stayed at Lomaland. In the courtroom, Griswold approached her, touched her arm, and asked, “Do you remember your papa?”

“Keep your hands off me, sir!” she shouted.

On the advice of Griswold’s attorney, judge E.S. Torrance dismissed the case. After the trial, the Los Angeles Times escalated its attacks.

No Times story offered proof until October 28: “Outrages at Point Loma: Women and Children Starved and Treated Like Convicts.”

Though situated on “the most beautiful spot on earth,” the colony was a “place of horror.” Armed men guarded the inmates and locked them in cells at night. The children “have been taken away to the child-pen and are never allowed to communicate in any way with mother or father.”

This “forced separation” included husbands and wives in “Tingley’s clutches.” Break her “iron rules” and you face hard labor, solitary confinement, and starvation.

A Mrs. Leavitt, a “believer in the true school of theosophy,” collected the information from Mrs. Neresheimer and Mrs. Hollbrook. Both “well-to-do Eastern women” had been “rescued” from Lomaland. They said Tingley “is just a “common, dollar-taking spirit medium.”

All the quotations were second-hand. The Times didn’t interview either woman.

That night, Tingley spoke at the Fisher Opera House. The local ministers who had banded against her are “catspaws in the hands of my enemies. Some day I shall publish a list of the Christian ministers who have been in court on the charge of adultery. I have learned more of the vileness of human nature since I came to the Coast than I ever knew before!”

Lomaland is not “a living Hades of immorality,” she said. All accusations come from a “gigantic conspiracy” determined to destroy “the Autocrat Tingley” and her vision for humanity. She vowed to sue the Los Angeles Times for libel. Owing to delays, the trial didn’t begin until December 1902.

When she did relief work in Cuba after the Spanish-American War, Tingley befriended Emilio Bacardi, mayor of Santiago and member of the rum dynasty. With his consent, she began bringing Cuban orphans, one or two at a time, to her Raja Yoga school on Point Loma.

In October 1902, Tingley “imported” nine boys and two girls between 5 and 10. Mayor Bacardi “must have had great faith in the regenerating power of Theosophy,” writes Emmett Greenwalt, “because a shipboard photograph reveals a wild-looking band of urchins.”

They sailed from Cuba to New York under the care of Gertrude Van Pelt, M.D. and Theosophist. At Ellis Island, authorities locked them in a six-by-twelve-foot room for immigrants with infectious diseases. The room was vacant except for two cots and a crusty, brown-stained sink.

According to the New York Sun, on November 1, thousands of vehement Cubans shouted hate-filled slogans, burned American flags, and ordered the U.S. government to return the children at once. If not, the Spanish-American War would re-ignite.

A board of inquiry conducted a hearing. Vernon M. Davis, president of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children — known as the “Gerry Society” — urged they go back. Though he admitted it was hearsay, Davis claimed that Point Loma was “financially irresponsible” and “morally incompetent.” Such a vile “atmosphere” was no place for children.

The next day Albert Spalding, Theosophist and former commissioner of Major League Baseball, told reporters about conditions at Ellis Island. That same day, the New York Tribune announced there were no demonstrations in Cuba. According to a cable from Santiago, the children “left town under the most pleasant circumstances.”

On hearing the news, the board improved living conditions but kept Mrs. Van Pelt and the children incarcerated.

Spalding demanded to know who was behind the multi-pronged attack. The board refused to answer. Instead, they scheduled a second hearing for November 5.

Part one | Part two | Part four

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from the web

Comments

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close