• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Residents of Kensington and Talmadge say the city must take a greater role in regulating where the green utility boxes are placed during the massive effort to bury overhead utility lines. Cable companies disagree, claiming the city has no say in the matter.

During the past two months, legal counsel for both sides have drafted letters to city councilmembers, fanning the flames to a longstanding conflict over public right-of-way.

The issue dates back to 2003, when the California Public Utilities Commission tacked on a surcharge to electric bills that would pay for the removal of overhead utility lines and underground them, having them meet inside green utility boxes.

The city has so far annually spent approximately $54 million in surcharge revenues to bury the lines.

The program got off to a quick start, but not without some bumps in the road, and the sidewalk. The Kensington and Talmadge communities were among the first neighborhoods to host the undergrounding efforts and the first to lodge complaints over the scattering of green utility boxes along the sidewalk and public right-of-way. Their complaints spurred them to hire legal counsel.

Residents and their legal counsel urged city representatives to address the issue.

They suffered a setback when city attorney Jan Goldsmith's office issued a May 2012 report that found the city did not have the authority to regulate the placement of the boxes. The report didn't stop the residents.

"Currently, there is no forum to address these issues, particularly in regard to the placement of utility boxes," wrote attorneys for the residents in an October 21 letter to the city. "Creation of the proposed Utility Underground Advisory Committee would allow all stakeholders — the utilities, the city, and the communities — to work together to study ways to potentially mitigate these concerns and consider options."

The letter claimed that the City Attorney's Office got it wrong in its May 2012 report, citing three legal cases that indicate local municipalities have a right, and obligation, to factor in impacts to neighborhood aesthetics when burying the lines.

A partial victory came when the Land Use and Housing Committee formed the Utility Underground Advisory Committee during an October 23 meeting.

Now, attorneys for Cox and Time Warner Communications are firing back. They oppose the creation of the advisory group and believe that the city should shoulder the financial burden if any new regulations are enacted.

In early November, an attorney for the California Cable Telecommunications Association, which represents Cox and Time Warner cable companies, responded to the October 21 letter. The letter takes issue with the city assuming any role other than funding the program. Attorneys argue that the California Public Utilities Commission is in charge of the program, not the city or some city-sponsored advisory committee.

"The cable operators also maintain that imposing additional undergrounding requirements and providing a role for property owners in the design process would materially breach the cable operator's agreements with the city," wrote attorney Gardner Gillespie from the Sheppard Mullin law firm in a November 4 letter. "Accordingly, the cable operators urge the city not to go forward with any of the suggested modifications to the undergrounding policy."

(corrected 12/27, 5:40 p.m.)

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

Comments

shirleyberan Dec. 27, 2013 @ 7:22 p.m.

Underground cables are long overdue here. Overground wires might be 100 yearsoldlike the neighborhood.

0

dwbat Dec. 27, 2013 @ 10:37 p.m.

I seriously doubt any of the wires are 100 years old.

0

CaptD Dec. 28, 2013 @ 12:15 p.m.

Undergrounding is what voters voted for!

Claiming that burying SOME of the wires and then placing huge boxes into the public sidewalks creating an eyesore is NOT!

In MidCity, some residents have even gotten more than one in front of their homes, aren't they lucky, NOT!

This is all about saving Big Bucks for Big Corp.'s no wonder the City is now trying to look the other ways while residents cry FOUL.

Affluent areas of SD, want no part of this BLIGHT, and thought they had the Political muscle to avoid being blighted, but now they too see that all the promises they got while giving donations has been for naught!

Welcome to the new $an Diego, where money rules, expect things to only get much worse after the next election, since those left running have had to seek huge donations just to stay in the race and will have to "payback" their donators back...

We voted for underground VAULTS, Not above ground sidewalk boxes (aka Graffiti Magnets)...

Follow-on idea: Perhaps Dorian can list how much they have already taken from those that re installing these BOXES and also list the total amounts donated (after the election is over).

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close