Aldine Drive Stoppage

In the article, “Stop Signs Snarl Streets” we would be interested in learning where the author obtained her information and facts. Did she consider the impact this has on the residential community of Talmadge?

City Heights residents should not be cutting through from El Cajon Blvd. to go down Aldine Drive to access Fairmount. City Heights should have quicker access via El Cajon Boulevard to Fairmount. Aldine was originally designed to connect Talmadge and Kensington, and provide those of us who live in Talmadge another way in and out of our neighborhood.

What is most frustrating is if people followed the speed limit and drove properly, the need for action at this location would be mute. A survey was done of our community regarding the stop signs ,and possible solutions, and 80% were against this. There were a select few who complained, and complained some more.

Now the entire community of Talmadge has unsafe streets, and reckless drivers. This morning I had to call San Diego police as one pedestrian was almost hit by not just one, but four drivers. Drivers are impatient due to the long line of vehicles backing up on Monroe all the way to Winona. These impatient drivers decided the oncoming traffic lane was empty for the moment so they drove quickly on the wrong side of the road just to turn left onto 48th Street. The irony of it was when I finally got to 48th Street, there was a backup of vehicles on 48th trying to turn onto El Cajon Blvd.

I also witnessed cars swerving around one another at the intersection of Euclid and Monroe. At 47th and Monroe there are signs for “right turn only.” As I passed this corner this morning, three motorcycle police sat on their bikes and simply watched a minivan attempt to illegally turn left from 47th onto Monroe right in front of me. As a mom, my “no-no” finger shake made its appearance as I shook my head and waved my finger. That’s a no-no. Did the police budge? Nope.

I think it’s terrible that money, time, and energy were spent on this endeavor. This morning cops waved us through the new stop sign trying to help traffic. So many less costly options could have been attempted before impacting hundreds of residents, families with little children, grandparents, and dog walkers. Residents are now apprehensive to do so because of the reckless, frustrated, angry drivers.

The city should not have listened to those very noisy complainers, but instead performed traffic studies, impact studies, and increased police presence — and actually do their job and ticket people.

Something needs to change. Your reporter should get feedback from the actual residents before reporting. As it stands there are three ways for us Talmadgians to get into and out of our neighborhood.

  1. El Cajon Boulevard problem: Too many lights that have poor timing and traffic backup.
  2. Collwood problem: Currently Collwood at Montezuma is under construction (as it has been for a very long time) taking two lanes down to one lane, two lights, and a long line of cars stuck trying to turn left to get to Interstate 8 (which normally has a dedicated left turn lane and a middle lane to turn left or right), and the rest of the cars trying to turn right (again can use the middle lane and the dedicated right turn lane — that is when construction does not shut down two of those lanes).
  3. Aldine problem: Inconsiderate drivers who do not obey traffic signs and speed limits prior to stop sign installation; post signs — extreme traffic backup, addition of a minimum of 15 minutes to commute, angry, reckless drivers filling up all residential streets in Talmadge making it unsafe for cyclists, pedestrians, and other drivers.

This is absolutely ridiculous, and someone with a planning degree with experience in traffic flow needs to be consulted and they need to fix this problem sooner than later. I know I am one of many voices. The other can be heard/seen on the Talmadge Google group and Nextdoor Talmadge where there are hundreds of messages regarding this disaster as well as photos and videos and real statistics.

Name Withheld
via email

Estuary Sand Not a Threat

I am commenting on the recent article entitled “Imported Sand a Threat to Estuary,” written by a reporter for your publication, Lucy. D. Barker. This article implies that I, Brian Collins, Refuge Manager for Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge and proud employee of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, was interviewed by this reporter and that I made certain assertions regarding the recently deposited beach replenishment project sand that has been migrating south towards the Tijuana River mouth from the deposition areas where SANDAG conducted a sand replenishment project in recent months within the City of Imperial Beach.

For the record, I was not interviewed by a reporter by the name of Lucy Barker. I was not contacted by a person identifying herself as Lucy Barker, reporter for the San Diego Reader. That simply didn’t happen. Second, and more importantly, the tenor of the article is such that it implies that there is some imminent threat to the estuary’s ecological functionality by this recently deposited sand, potentially causing the mouth to close, and impinging on the tidal exchange of this wetland.

While we continue to be concerned and watchful, we do not believe that is the current case. The deposited sand seems to have stabilized in its movements to some degree. Through ongoing consultations with coastal hydrologists, we expect that the littoral transport cell offshore of the river mouth should start to tend to move material north as spring progresses into summer. In the case of the sand placed as part of the beach nourishment project, that means it should move away from the river mouth, not towards it.

While it is true that estuary staff have been and remain concerned about the potential for this material to have an ecological impact to the estuary, those concerns have been receding in recent weeks based on our field observations and professional consultations, combined with our ongoing monitoring of water quality conditions within the estuary.

More from SDReader

More from the web

Comments

Lucy D. Barker April 5, 2013 @ 12:19 p.m.

Re: Tijuana Estuary

It is alarming to see Brian Collins, as part of U.S. Fish & Wildlife, attack his own public statements as false, especially since he made those SAME statements to at least two other media outlets without launching similar attacks. (Google: 'Brian Collins Tijuana Estuary Sand' to see for yourself.)

Perhaps he does not understand that when a publicly paid employee speaks at a public meeting in a public setting on the topic of public land, it is assumed that he is making a public statement. Certainly, reporters do not have to chase down the mayor or the President after they speak in public and ask them to verify what they just said. No one accuses them of a lack of ethics for working from these public statements.

Since Collins said those things in a public setting, and since he made identical statements to other media outlets without the subsequent personal attacks on those reporters, one can only wonder if Collins' - and U.S. Fish & Wildlife's - attack is retaliation for our persistent and consistent interest in the Tijuana Estuary and Border Field State Park.

(We have recently reported on the estuary's failure to file important environmental information, on decisions to restrict and reduce public access to public land - a complaint made at public meetings by the Tijuana River Valley Equestrian Association and Friends of Friendship Park, and on sewage contamination and sand threats to the estuary.)

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close