• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

A proposed change from Kate Sessions Park’s 12-hour alcohol ban to a 24-hour alcohol ban was on the Santa Clara/Pacific Beach Recreation Council’s agenda on Tuesday, January 19.

Some of the reasons given for the proposition included: public urination, binge drinking, dogs off leashes, noise, broken glass, and drunk drivers. Presentations were made by both supporting and opposing parties.

Richard Kiser, president of Friends of Kate Sessions, said, “We’re here because of unintended consequences of Proposition D; 26 miles of shoreline have been reduced to 17 acres of legal area for drinking.”

Kiser addressed the park’s inability to handle the volume of visitors it regularly attracts: “There are 140 parking spaces inside the park. About 300 permits are issued daily. On weekends, 600 to 1000 people are using it.”

An eight-year resident named Mike said, “The facility can’t handle something like over-the-line every weekend. There are fraternity guys running around in wigs and skirts. It’s unpoliced bedlam as a direct result of the ban. I think Kate Sessions would turn over in her grave if she saw how the park was being used.”

One resident claimed that 65 calls were placed to the SDPD between August and December of 2009. It was stated that the police don’t have the manpower to handle park-related calls and that response times can range from one-and-a-half to three hours.

Those opposed to the ban argued their right to have a beer on a blanket while watching the sunset, in addition to their right to have office picnics, weddings, and other responsible parties. Some did not feel the issue should be in the hands of the Santa Clara/PB Park and Recreation Department.

While many disagreed about the imposition of a 24-hour ban, most agreed that taking alcohol off the beaches caused this problem and that taking alcohol out of the park will cause yet another. The consensus was that a designated, and perhaps monitored, alternative area for responsible public drinking is necessary.

According to a Friends of Kate Sessions Park handout provided during the meeting, in San Diego County there are 174 community and neighborhood parks; 153 have a 24-hour alcohol ban. The council voted to recommend the ban.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

More from the web

Comments

PistolPete Jan. 21, 2010 @ 1:32 a.m.

This city is getting worse and worse as the days drag on...

To paraphrase Detective John McClane while stuck in an elevator shaft, "...Come out to the coast..."

0

PB92109 Jan. 30, 2010 @ 1:19 p.m.

It would have been nice if your "Stringer" actually actually attempted to do some real reporting and investigated some of the alleged "facts" thrown about at this meeting.

Were there 65 calls made to the police during the period in question? what was the breakdown of these calls? for all we know it could have been for dogs off the leash, teenagers smoking weed in their cars, homeless passed out on the grass, etc.

How about checking the origins of the non-alcohol parks? A cursory review of the city ordinances would reveal that the vast majority banning drinking are associated with parks shared with recreation complexes or with schools.

A simple talk with the Parks and Recreation district manager at the meeting provides the additional information that this was not the definitive meeting and that the proposal must also be presented to and voted on AT LEAST by the Coastal Area Committee of the Park and Recreation Councils, the Park and Recreation Board, the Land Use and Housing Committee and the City Council. Some were of the opinion that it would need to go to a full City-wide vote, claiming this park was exempted as part of the beach alcohol ban ordinance.

0

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close