• Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

— A fog of paranoia surrounds the U.S. Department of Justice's Immigration Court in San Diego. The mentality suffuses not only the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (the former INS) in its constant watch for terrorists and smugglers but also the minds of immigrants the bureau hauls into court -- and the lawyers who defend them. Immigration attorneys often speak furtively about cases in which officials are abusing their clients. Yet they rarely discuss details or encourage the clients to talk, for fear that the publicity will cause the government to retaliate. And that's when they're polite. Inquiries to Guy Grande, Esq., in the law firm of Aguirre and Cotman, resulted in someone in his office slamming the phone down twice without response or explanation.

"You certainly can understand the fears of immigrants," says immigration attorney Douglas Nelson. "They are based on the types of government and press they have in the countries they come from." But the reputation for aggressiveness by U.S. government agents in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, has contributed as well.

Lilia Velasquez, an immigration attorney who also teaches at California Western School of Law, says, "The aggressiveness problem with my counterparts at [immigration enforcement] is that they have no autonomy compared to us. They are bound by government policies." And decisionmakers in the agency often use discretion in the application of policy. That results in what Velasquez calls "selective enforcement." An example was Immigration Enforcement's recent decision to immediately detain any newly arriving immigrants from Iraq and a number of other Arab countries. Many people thought that the government had passed a new law requiring the detentions on national security grounds. But, according to Velasquez, immigration law permits the government to detain any incoming aliens. It chooses to do so only selectively.

The former INS also used selective enforcement during 1996, says Velasquez, to restrict aliens' right to work in the U.S. This was a time when then-California governor Pete Wilson and others were making immigration reform a political issue.

The bureau's behavior has resulted in what Robert Schneider calls "many sad cases" of harm done to good people and their families. Five months ago Schneider, who is now 62, began practicing as an attorney before San Diego's Immigration Court, whose judges he calls "the only thing we have to protect our clients against the aggressiveness of the [bureau]."

Like Velasquez, Schneider acknowledges, "The government counsel has to do its job honorably. They have to vigorously prosecute their cases." But according to Schneider, they seem to be "trying to sweep as many people as they can into deportation proceedings and move them out." And Schneider thinks the public supports it. "It's a mindset," he says. "There is a feeling in the public now that, 'Gee, we've got these aliens out there, and they may be terrorists.' A group of bad people has smeared over everybody who is an immigrant, even Hispanics."

Schneider himself worked nearly 30 years for the U.S. Department of Justice, the last 7 of them as an administrative law judge. In that capacity he heard employment discrimination and sanctions cases for the Executive Office for Immigration Review, an agency that also oversees the work of Immigration Court. Since his retirement in 1995, he has taught constitutional and immigration law for Los Angeles School of Law, Ventura School of Law, and Thomas Jefferson School of Law. Currently he teaches for Western Sierra School of Law in San Diego.

In his brief service to immigrants so far, Schneider has seen "people who have been here most of their lives and suddenly find themselves with a one-way ticket to Colombia or Guatemala, where they've never been before. And their families get torn apart."

For 20 of his years in the justice department, Schneider worked as a federal district prosecutor in Missouri, where he also did a 2-year stint as a state prosecutor. "In that work," he says, "you're a mean person. I put some very bad people in prison -- organized criminals, drug dealers, murderers, rapists. And there is a satisfaction in getting those people off the street. It's in the late afternoon, the verdicts come back, and those people are off the street. They're no longer going to hurt people, and you feel, if you fought for weeks, that finally you did something good.

"But I find the immigration work, in some ways, more rewarding to me than anything I've ever done," Schneider continues. "Because when you help somebody who's been in jail for a long time but is not a criminal, and you bring their family together, it's a tearjerker. Everybody comes up to you and hugs you and they love you. As a prosecutor, nobody loves you."

Schneider admits that evil as well as good people turn up as respondents in Immigration Court. A visitor on December 10 of last year might have claimed to see one of each in Judge Joseph Ragusa's courtroom in the basement of the Federal Building downtown. A bailiff led them both into court in their orange prison uniforms.

Lilia Antonia Hernandez Cortez, from El Salvador, looked frightened as she sat waiting her turn before the judge. A man closer to the bench kept turning to look at her strikingly pretty face. Members of Cortez's family had tried to get approved for her a Form I-130, which can permit an alien to remain in the U.S. on the basis of connection to relatives who already have legal status here. But something in her case -- information that could not be discerned from the back of the courtroom -- made Judge Ragusa declare her a "deportable or inadmissible alien." After he questioned whether she had any fear about returning to El Salvador, Cortez agreed to "voluntary departure" following a short time longer in custody. "This is no black mark against you for the future," said Ragusa. "But entrance into the United States is a privilege, not a right."

Mohdar Mohamed Abdullah followed Cortez to the respondent's table. On October 3, Abdullah made national news when federal court in San Diego sentenced him to six months in jail for helping the 9/11 terrorists get drivers' licenses. The court then turned him over to the INS for removal from the U.S.

  • Story alerts
  • Letter to Editor
  • Pin it

More from SDReader

More from the web

Comments

Sign in to comment

Join our
newsletter list

Enter to win $25 at Broken Yolk Cafe

Each newsletter subscription
means another chance to win!

Close